The interface is CORBA based, but it is all wrapped in Java helper classes.
These Java wrappers make it feel like EJB. From a design stand point, you
deal with Homes/Remotes... the usual stuff.

-Chris.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 7:03 PM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      Re: Workflow products
>
> What sort of interface do they provide?
> Does it look like a CORBA service, or is it wrapped under a session bean?
>
> Thanks,
> Thor HW
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Raber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 3:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Workflow products
>
>
> > Proneel,
> >
> > For what it is worth, we have have many customers using Verve and
> GemStone/J
> > together in just the manner you describe. Also one configuration of
> Verve
> > uses GemStone/J for its persistence engine.
> >
> > Verve is really neat in that it is focused only on the process aspect of
> the
> > problem, and cleanly separates business data and organizational
> information.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > -Chris.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Proneel Guptan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 2:05 PM
> > > To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject:      Workflow products
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We are looking to use workflow technologies to manage long running
> > > business processes. However, a significant portion of our application
> > > would still run in an EJB/JMS environment; we expect that workflow
> > > activities would call into our session beans as part of the processing
> > > of tasks and our beans would also call into the workflow to complete
> > > or release tasks in a specific business process.
> > >
> > > The main criteria for us is (as expected) scalability and performance.
> > > We would naturally be interested only in Java based workflow engines
> > > preferably with a strong integration into EJB or JMS technologies.
> > >
> > > We are in the process of evaluating 2 products, Verve and jFlow
> > > (a company that BEA recently purchased).
> > >
> > > We would be very interested to know of other java based workflow
> > > products; we would like to hear from vendors and from users too,
> > > if possible. Any user experiences on Verve and jFlow would also
> > > be greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Proneel.
> > >
> > >
> ==========================================================================
> > > =
> > > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> > > body
> > > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email
> to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
> >
> >
> ==========================================================================
> =
> > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> body
> > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
> >
> >
>
> ==========================================================================
> =
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to