Randy Stafford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, Tim, let's play by your rules for a minute.
>
> I develop on Windows. I have compared your jCVS 4.7 and wincvs.org's WinCVS
> 1.0.6 and found jCVS to be vastly inferior, and I'm cross-posting to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and comp.software.config-mgmt. I'm recommending WinCVS to
> everyone. I don't have a legal or ethical problem because both jCVS and
> WinCVS are distributed under the GNU Public License ("activities other than
> copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they
> are outside its scope").
Sounds fine. I would post a reply stating that people should try 5.1.
It competes quite well with WinCVS.
Where is the problem, Sir?
Only in your *intentional* spreading of misinformation. Which has nothing
to do with an honest, third party, details fully disclosed test.
Frankly, I will place my lot with my code. Which has proven to be quite
a successful strategy to date.
> Regards,
> Randy Stafford
>
> PS. I see at http://www.trustice.com/java/index.shtml that you have
> experience in "SmallTalk" - FYI, it's spelled Smalltalk.
Thank you.
> PPS. Your domain name implies that you want people to trust you, and yet
> you're openly announcing that you'll litigate the validity of software
> licenses?
Randy, please, I am feeling bad for you now. I hope that people would trust
me not to lie down and take it from an overzealous ministry, er, I mean vendor.
I guess it depends on your definition of trust. I trusted that report to remain
available on the internet, and now it is gone.
tim.
Tim Endres [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICE Engineering, Inc. http://www.trustice.com/
"USENET - a slow moving self parody." - Peter Honeyman
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
