I agree on that. It would be much more interesting to hear comments (vendor
and others) on comparison itself than continue the version and licence
debate.
Personally I'm pretty interested in hearing comments on performance and
scalability tests.
It would be also nice to see actual source code and more detailed
descriptions of the comparison (like database, version, possible
optimizations etc.).
I also hope this won't scare people away on doing this kind of performance
tests and publishing the results. One can allways point out flaws and there
is allways new version around the corner which will solve all the problems,
but I still think the tests are usefull.
Jouni Juutinen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew Sweet
> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 4:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: EJB Server Comparison (WebLogic,
>
>
> There are no perfect benchmarks whether the vendor(s) get involved or not.
> No benchmark is to be taken as the "be-it-end-all", but is a
> useful piece of
> information to use when trying to craft industrial-strength solutions for
> clients that can handle the appropriate workload.
>
> The value of the posted benchmarks I am afraid is being lost in this grand
> licensing debate. When the benchmarks were posted and the representatives
> of the vendors responded this was valuable information to me. I
> was hoping
> the discussion was going to continue along those lines. But maybe I am in
> the minority....
>
> Andrew Sweet
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
