Back on Nov. 19th of last year James Frentress in a message to the list
offered to send out some code he had for generating GUIDs in Java (I found
his message in the archive).
I tried to contact James about a month ago, and again a few days ago, and it
would seem that he is no longer around at the email address he gave.
If anybody got the code from him and is willing to pass it along to me, I
would very much appreciate it (subject to any licensing restrictions stated
in the code of course).
Colin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Castaneda
> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2000 5:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: isCallerInRole()
>
>
> Francis,
>
> <vendor>
> You can try Inprise Application Server 4.0, we implemented on top of
> VisiBroker 4.0, which is CORBA 2.3 compliant. It also uses VisiBroker ITS,
> our CORBA OTS transaction service.
>
> </vendor>
>
> regards,
>
> -Robert
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of francis pouatcha
> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2000 9:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: isCallerInRole()
>
>
> see inline,
>
> Javier Borrajo wrote:
>
> > >> DCOM and CORBA/IIOP allow for the propagation of both security and
> > >> transaction context information.
> > >>
> > >> RMI/JRMP and RMI/IIOP do not. See:
> > >> http://forum.java.sun.com/forum?[EMAIL PROTECTED]^[email protected]
> > >>
> > >> So I wonder how can any EJB vendor out there support EJB
> > >> security or client transactions at all ?
> > >
> > >Simple. By using IIOP as the protocol between EJB client and
> EJB server!
> >
> > I'm not getting it yet, sorry if I look dense...
> >
> > EJB mandates RMI/IIOP, not IIOP. I understand it is not the same to
> > use Java/IDL/idl2java/CORBA/IIOP than to use Java/RMI/IIOP ?
>
> RMI-IIOP also uses the IIOP protokol.
>
> >
> > Anyway, what happens with BEA WebLogic and any other
> > RMI EJB servers?
>
> BEA WebLogic and oder RMI EJB servers should move to RMI-IIOP to ensure
> interoperability among servers. EJB needs a common logic for transmitting
> client transaction and security properties, a common
> communication protocol.
> RMI-IIOP will anyway be mandatory in the next EJB releases.
>
> --
> Francis Pouatcha
>
> MATHEMA Software GmbH
> http://www.mathema.de
>
> ==================================================================
> =========
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include
> in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
> ==================================================================
> =========
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include
> in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
