Sorry for the app server specific question, but does anyone have Inprise
Application Server running on Red Hat Linux 6.2. I downloaded the eval
version for linux from their web site and can't seem to get it working.
The people from Inprise don't seem to be getting to far with the problem
either.
Cheers
Lee
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sunil Dangwal [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 4:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: J2EE - Server
>
> Do have a look at the Inprise Application Server. I found it way ahead of
> others in terms of ease of use and smooth deployments. Performance is
> good.
> CORBA features are also excellent with VISIBROKER integrated with it.
> But still I feel strange that it is not very popular.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Regards,
> Sunil Dangwal
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Humphrey Sheil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 4:32 AM
> Subject: Re: J2EE - Server
>
>
> > In vendor selection, you have two groups to consider, commercial, well
> > established vendors and open source / very low cost (OS / VLC) vendors.
> The
> > pros / cons between these two are fairly clear cut:
> >
> > Commercial Pros
> >
> > Good support
> > Higher standard of documentation (generally)
> > Good market penetration (so hiring experienced developers etc. is
> easier)
> > You can be sure they'll be around next year to answer your questions
> > Some vendors who are on the expert groups at Javasoft, obviously use
> this
> > knowledge to make sure they protect their interests (and by extension
> yours)
> > as the new specs. unfold by either supporting them in released products
> or
> > getting beta versions roadtested early
> >
> >
> > Commercial Cons
> >
> > High initial cost of ownership (over time however, this should lessen)
> > Some commercial vendors are slow to support the new specs. as they are
> > released (in contrast to the pro listed above)
> > Some commercials have been around a while and thus are not 100% Java
> > (usually having C++ components), each vendor should make this clear in
> the
> > docs however.
> >
> > OS / VLC Pros
> >
> > Low / zero initial cost of ownership
> > Small and nimble enough to turn on a penny when it comes to spec.
> conformity
> > and new features
> > All (AFAIK) are 100% Java
> >
> > OS / VLC Cons
> >
> > Documentation can be poor compared to commercial
> > It's harder to find developers who know the server
> > Support is not clear cut and must be considered a risk, particularly if
> you
> > are consulting and will be handing the finished software off to a client
> > (who may not have a strong skillset in-house).
> >
> >
> > In order to avoid missing any one vendor out, here's a pretty complete
> list
> > of links for app. servers with follow-on links etc.:
> > http://www.mgm-edv.de/ejbsig/ejbservers.html
> >
> >
> > My own personal opinion is that I'd still spec. a commercial vendor for
> at
> > least the next 6 - 12 months, but I play around with servers like Orion
> and
> > jBoss in the meantime and lurk on the lists to see how stable they are
> (;-))
> >
> > Humphrey
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wolfgang Egger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 10 July 2000 10:08
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: J2EE - Server
> >
> >
> > Servus,
> >
> > we are going to start developing a B2B - "portal" and we have decided to
> use
> > J2EE - EJB - technology.
> >
> > Now, besides our concrete design, we are thinking about what server we
> > should use. The server shoul dmake it possible to develop 100% pure Java
> -
> > "apps" and to do that in an as standardized way as possible, so that we
> can
> > change the server without too much trouble if needed.
> >
> > Has anyone any hints URLs and so on, that could help us to take the
> > decission?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > Wolfgang Egger
> >
> > --
> > Synemedia Productions
> > Hildegardstr. 28 | 10715 Berlin, Germany | Tel: +49(0)30-862 23 80
> > mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www: http://www.synemedia.de
> >
> >
> ==========================================================================
> =
> > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> body
> > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
> >
> >
> ==========================================================================
> =
> > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> body
> > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
> >
>
> ==========================================================================
> =
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
