Le 14/04/2014 21:06, John Smith a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Julien Puydt <jpu...@free.fr> wrote:
I pushed a commit to fix those in ekiga... I'm actually quite surprised
there was so little to complain about!
Cool. 'cppcheck' hasnt got much more to complain about either:
http://lbalbalba.url.ph/cppcheck/ekiga/
I fixed them too, but I'm quite unhappy: the default C++ constructors
were adequately taking care of things, so those weren't worth it. In
fact, to get more correct core, one should probably *remove* the lines I
added, and then some more for good measure...
It's disappointing that those tests found out so little to complain
about... :-/
Snark
_______________________________________________
ekiga-devel-list mailing list
ekiga-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list
