Le 14/04/2014 21:06, John Smith a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Julien Puydt <jpu...@free.fr> wrote:

I pushed a commit to fix those in ekiga... I'm actually quite surprised
there was so little to complain about!

Cool. 'cppcheck' hasnt got much more to complain about either:
http://lbalbalba.url.ph/cppcheck/ekiga/


I fixed them too, but I'm quite unhappy: the default C++ constructors were adequately taking care of things, so those weren't worth it. In fact, to get more correct core, one should probably *remove* the lines I added, and then some more for good measure...

It's disappointing that those tests found out so little to complain about... :-/

Snark
_______________________________________________
ekiga-devel-list mailing list
ekiga-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Reply via email to