Well, I'm kind of assuming it's the P3! That the figures quoted have been consistent, suggests not only that the XG-2's have pretty much the same output but also that there is a common scaling (gain) or perhaps a systematic error in the P3.
It will, no doubt be sorted in time. Meanwhile, it's no big deal and I've found that I don't know how I've survived so long without a panadaptor, it introduces a whole new way of working. 73 Stephen G4SJP On 27/09/2010 20:33, "Joe Planisky" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Which do you suppose is inaccurate: the XG-2 or the P3? > > 73 > -- > Joe KB8AP > > > On Sep 27, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Stephen Prior wrote: > >> Hi Geoff >> >> I've had several replies, all report the XG-2's -73dBm level to be >> between >> about -78dBm and -80dBm on the P3, so it's at least consistent, and >> will, no >> doubt receive Elecraft's attention in due course! >> >> 73 Stephen >> > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
