I'm curious ... has anyone measured the actual difference in frequency stability with and without the KTCX03? I'm under the impression that the stock frequency stability is pretty solid. And aside from critical VHF/UHF work, is there any place that difference makes a ... well, uhh ... difference?
73, Dave AB7E On 1/5/2011 11:08 AM, Amateur Radio Operator N5GE wrote: > Hello John, > > I would get the KTCX03-1 option instead of the 2.8 filter. You won't notice > the > difference between the filters. I have two K3's one with the 2.7 and one with > the 2.8 and there is no real difference between the two. > > I would get the 500hz CW filter for starters. When you start working serious > DX > CW you can get one of the narrower filters for that. > > That's my opinion. I could be wrong. > > 73, > > Tom Childers > Radio Amateur N5GE ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
