If the "Split" function were to include a A->B like I suggested recently, this would not be an issue.
Some condemned this suggestion as a "bad" idea, but I doubt that they operate much or they would know what a pain in the neck this is. The logic should be: When Holding Split: if VFO B is not already on the same band and mode, then it should do a VFO A -> VFO B, and then Split should be turned on. If VFO B is already on the same band and mode as VFO A, then just turn Split on. I find that the second condition NEVER occurs. 73, Bob W5OV > > Exactly. I'm a new K3 owner (~1 week) and had the same issue a few days > into > ownership. VFO B was in a mode other than DATA A. > > To prevent it from happening again, I added a double tap of A->B to my "go > to RTTY" macro, which copies the mode of VFO A to VFO B, so both VFOs are > always the proper mode. > > GL & 73, > > Shel KF0UR > -- > View this message in context: > http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Re-Split-not-available-tp6012850p6016193.html > Sent from the [K3] mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
