Is there any other communication system that requires the kind of close-in 
dynamic range we do?  It certainly wouldn't make much sense to design a 
commercial system with such requirements.  It seems likely we hams have the 
toughest receiver dynamic range requirements on the planet.


Scott  K9MA


On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:

> Of course, if we didn't want to be able to copy with equal clarity
> over a > 100 dB input signal range, we could dispense with a lot of
> this. AND do that with signals of the extremes separated by a mere 250
> Hz.  We are so picky.  Why does anyone put up with us :>)

Scott Ellington
Madison, Wisconsin
USA



______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to