On 2/19/2012 8:02 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote: > I have always preferred what the commercial CW operators used, the QSA > report. QSA1 for audible but unreadable to QSA5 for perfect copy. The QSA > report considered both the strength and the 'copyability' of the signal. A > huge signal but a lousy "fist" might merit a QSA2. A much weaker signal but > in the clear with a good fist might deserve a QSA5.
INT QRK What is the readability of my signals? QRK 5 The readability of your signals is 5 [on a 1-5 scale] INT QSA What is the strength of my signals? QSA 4 The strength of your signals is 4 [on a 1-5 scale] INT QRI How is the tone of my transmission? QRI 1 The tone of your transmission is 3 [1=good, 2=variable, 3=bad] INT QSD Is my keying defective? QSD Your keying is defective. INT QKK How many knobs does your radio have? QKK 12 My radio has 12 knobs INT QKU How many of those do you know how to use? QKU 4 I know how to use 4 of them 73, Fred K6DGW - Northern California Contest Club - CU in the 2012 Cal QSO Party 6-7 Oct 2012 - www.cqp.org ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
