SM0RVV, Erik has it right. Starting at 0.70 on most bands you are fighting the digital modes anyway. I actually wouldn't mind a mod to make the total spread variable. I am very rarely above 0.25 on any of the bands. That way you could switch to 25kHz (example) total and have some real fine tuning. ...... Note: North American QSO Party (NAQP) CW contest this weekend. 12 hours totalstarting at 1800 UTC Sat. Great chance to WAS in just a few hours. Lots of BIG stations listening for QRP sigs... 73, Art W6KY
--- Erik Linder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Wang wrote: > > Does anyone out there use 150 kHz and LIKE it? Did > anyone out there > > try 150 kHz and hate it and switch to 80 kHz? > > I first built it with 150 kHz, but changed to 80 > after a few weeks. > The VFO was not exact enough for my taste. > And besides that, I did not use the upper part of > the 150 kHz span anyway. > > I vote for 80, but your milage may vary... > > 73 de SM0RVV ./Erik > K1 #1978 > K2 #4904 (just the speaker left to do, yipeee!) > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
