My experience with a MFJ pocket CW decoder seems to be more accurate and less delay than my K3. But I'll be the first to say the K3 may not be adjusted correctly.
Pete W4WWQ ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Gilbert" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 3:31 AM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Text Decoder > > > Compared to what? CW is difficult to decode, even when sent by > machine. What piece of software or equipment have you used that you > thought worked better than the K3? > > RTTY decodes better by machine because that's what it was designed for. > Morse code wasn't. If you're disappointed in the K3 text decoder, the > guy you probably want to complain to is long dead. > > Dave AB7E > > > > On 5/25/2012 9:13 PM, John_N1JM wrote: >> I'm a little disappointed in the text decoder for cw. It works fine for >> rtty. >> Anyone got any comments about this? >> >> 73, John N1JM >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
