As reported in earlier threads, 4.51 does seem to change the APF to a broader, less peaky shape, but it is less "noisy", so the previous impression of a signal jumping out of the tip of an inverted audio V of noise is no longer there. You no longer have the inverted audio V full of noise to tell you where to tune the signal to peak it up. You have to "remember" it, or tune very slowly across it. The peak is still there. Personally, I like it a little better this way, but's that's only my take.
It was reported by pre-beta testers as well. Dunno what Wayne is going to do about it. Also the CWT has been jostled in 4.51. That too under advisement by the brain trust. 73, Guy. On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Vic K2VCO <[email protected]> wrote: > I certainly can't quantify it, but it seems to me that the APF does not > work as well now > as it did before 4.51. > > It used to be a magic bullet. > > On 5/27/2012 8:31 PM, Bob K6UJ wrote: > > Can anyone give me feedback on 4.51 for the K3 as far as affecting the > APF on CW sigs ? > >> From what I've read so far the NB and NR are enhanced, I was wondering > if it has any affect on the APF. > > > > > > tnx, > > > > Bob > > K6UJ > > > -- > Vic, K2VCO > Fresno CA > http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
