Thanks Don, After trying to compare these two audio signals, I have arrived at this conclusion, valid for /my setup/ (e.g. noise from the laptop screen (look at my page on QRZCQ): IMHO the I/Q derived audio by the PC can be of some utility, but the KX3 does it better. SDR receivers (I own a PMSDR) are pleasant, but the "IF" to audio stages are another story : KX3 rules...
72 de FO/F5LCI Don Wilhelm-4 wrote > > There will be some latency - so you have "double latency" - once through > the KX3 and again through the panadapter software. That may or may not > be troublesome. If so, the only cure is another soundcard and the cable > to the headphone jack (and mic jack) > > You will likely want to use that 2nd sound card (one for the panadapter > the other for digital modes), because the KX3 has no provision for > transmit using the I/Q signals - to transmit, one needs to inject the > tones into the microphone jack, so just accept that fact and add the > path from the headphone jack to the soundcard as well. > > The "listen through" is nice because it does provide a 2nd receiver > function for CW and SSB modes, and the frequency separation can be > greater than the KX3 dual watch limitations. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/I-O-output-level-tp7562551p7562853.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
