Thank you Ron ;)
My first experience with the Amateur Radio Service was through participation in nets. These were FM repeater nets initially, then SSB HF nets, and finally CW NTS nets. I learned to pass traffic for NTS both using voice and via CW. It takes practice. Net procedures, phonetics, prosigns (both CW and voice) are something which requires repetition. When an emergency occurs and one is required to work ECOM the training needs to be so ingrained phonetics and procedures are automatic. Ms. Patricia and I have trained quite a number of folks in ECOM (ARECC levels 1, 2, and 3) for the local ARES/RACES group. I have been involved in ARES and in MARS for a number of years. One of the reasons I started the Elecraft CW Net was to get folks used to the idea of using CW using net procedures and getting them interested in contacts other than rag chews or contests. Tom, N0SS, and I have modified and adapted normal net procedures and QN codes to our needs. Working a CW NTS net is different but not wildly so. Gaining proficiency in CW is one thing but passing accurate traffic is another. When Pat and I train folks we have them pass traffic in groups. Carter, N3AO, gave us some tips. One of them was to have multiple people pass traffic simultaneously in the same room to mimic the chaos in a comms center. It worked. Our trainees have worked comms at the local sheriff's office and at the county EOC where the noise level gets pretty high. They valued our training and told us so as soon as the emergency was over. Thank you Carter, you gave great advice. Pat and I developed our hybrid classroom material to cover ECOM for the Oregon and Pacific Northwest area. We don't get hurricanes but do have floods, typhoons, earthquakes, and forest fires. Handling traffic is an important part of our training. I have not had the chance to teach others CW ECOM work but I would love to do so. We may have a call out of our local ARES group to assist some evacuees from New Orleans. I am on the list. I got to sell amateur radio and ECOMs to the local TV station last week for some work I had done for the SATERN folks. I did not get a chance to view the interview since we cannot receive television here but was told by an op I had never met that the interview portrayed the service in a very good light. I am thankful for that. I have worked in a newsroom before and know how a story can be spun in various directions. The reporter and camera man were both very kind and caring individuals. Hopefully they will send me a copy of the spot.
   Kevin.  KD5ONS  (Still Net Control Operator 5th Class)


On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 14:32:25 -0700, Ron D'Eau Claire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

...
I submit that the reason virtually ALL emergency nets are phone is that CW requires a skill few Hams have today: even routine CW ops. Handling a QSO,
even a rag chew, is a far, far cry from participating in a controlled CW
net. That's a skill that takes time, more time, and even more time and a lot
of patience and dedication to master. Just ask Kevin Rock who runs the
Elecraft CW net!

Getting enough Hams current with the skills to do that efficiently has
always been a huge problem, even when every Ham had to be proficient at CW to get a license. That's the real reason for all those routine traffic nets
we used to have across the bands every night. Even back then, how many of
those experienced ops would be in the middle of the disaster, ready to
handle traffic? Not many, not often.
...

Ron AC7AC
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to