So then it's all up to you, John: Do you want to
eliminate manual tuning or have 100 W output more?
73, Phil w7ox
On 2/21/14, 1:31 PM, John Saxon wrote:
Thanks, Chuck.
Apologies to the group for omitting a subject.
I was thinking amp first simply because I do have a tuner, although manual, but
I do not have 100 watts. Doesn't sound like either way would be significantly
harder than the other.
Thanks & 73,
John
K5ENQ
On Friday, February 21, 2014 3:01 PM, Chuck Shefflette - AA3CS <[email protected]>
wrote:
John,
There are no real issues with installing either the KPA3 or the KAT3. There is
a shield that is included with the KPA3 kit (I don’t believe it comes with the
base radio, but it has been 4 years since I built my kit) that might be easier
to put in before the KAT3. Personally, I’d get them both first but if I could
only get one, it would be the KAT3.
73,
Chuck
AA3CS
------
“Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.” -- Pablo Picasso
On Feb 21, 2014, at 3:45 PM, John Saxon <[email protected]> wrote:
I have a K3/10 with no add-ons, and now am ready to get a KPA3 100W amp & KAT3
tuner, to install myself. I would rather not purchase them at the same time. Is
there a more favorable order to get them? Amp first or tuner first? I suspect
there may be some construction issues that would favor one over the other to be
acquired first.
Thanks & 73,
John
K5ENQ
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
