That's a good and useful presentation. Although they don't affect Jim's vertical vs. horizontal conclusions, slides 22, 26, and 73 contain errors confusing quarter- and half wavelengths for 160/80/40 meters (i.e. 133 ft is a quarter wave on 160, not a half wave).
John, KU4AF Pittsboro, NC Elecraft mailing list wrote > The K9YC modelling with EZNEC > <http://k9yc.com/VertOrHorizontal-Slides.pdf> is quite interesting. > Certainly has me thinking about vertical dipoles. The half-wave end-fed > looks like the perfect candidate for a simple vertical dipole. > > Doug -- K0DXV -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/RF-in-the-Trees-tp7590553p7590582.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
