On 2015-07-30 12:36 AM, TJ Campie wrote:
> Joe, You are correct when the input device has been enumerated as a
> microphone input, which is the bug.

No, enumerating the device as a microphone input is *not a bug* when
the device descriptor specifically identifies the input as microphone.

If the designer is using the PCM290x device in a "line in" deign, he
should be using the PCM290xC (or current equivalent) which identifies
the input terminal as 0x603 (Line connector) instead of the PCM290xB
which identifies as microphone.

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV


On 2015-07-30 12:36 AM, TJ Campie wrote:
Joe, You are correct when the input device has been enumerated as a
microphone input, which is the bug. Without "clearing" the bug
forcing windows to enumerate it as a line in device, 100 on the
slider is indeed adding gain.

However after clearing the bug, it's now enumerated as a line in
device and 100 on the slider is 0db, even if it reads +30 (the UI and
dialogue box still thinks this is a microphone input device, this is
part of the bug). This was verified by feeding a reference signal of
a known level into the chip and obtaining a known output level,
confirming 100 on the slider is indeed 0db of gain/attenuation AFTER
clearing the bug.

This behaviour is confirmed by TI themselves in this whitepaper:
http://www.ti.com/lit/an/sbfa020/sbfa020.pdf

If you have a signal generator I highly recommend feeding a reference
level signal into a device using the chip and measuring the output
yourself AFTER clearing the bug. Remember, you are correct that the
slider value will add gain when it's been incorrectly enumerated as a
microphone device. Measure a reference input signal AFTER clearing
it. Hope that helps the confusion

73 TJ W0EA

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to