Look at the A/D converter as a chip tool that could potentially be used
in ham RX design.
If one wanted a ham band RX using an A/D front end, certainly one would
add front end filters.
Of course, that would only help solve the problem with out of band
signals. Handling the vector sum of in band signals would still have to
be designed for.
The concept however is a good one. Who knows where these A/D chips will
be in 2, 5 or 10 years.
I remember when GPS was in its infancy. Many people thought it was
crazy to think that a bunch of low orbit non-geosynchronous satellites
could be used for extremely accurate positioning. Besides the ground
equipment required would be too expensive for most users. History
proves them wrong.
73 de Brian/K3KO
On 9/16/2015 12:25 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
On 9/16/2015 12:43 AM, Alan wrote:
So how long before ADC technology catches up to the K3? If Moore's
law applied (doubling of performance every couple years) it wouldn't
be long. Unfortunately Moore's law applies mainly to digital
circuitry but the key parts of an ADC are analog (the "A" in "ADC").
Unless there is a big theoretical breakthrough in ADC architecture, I
think we still have some years to wait.
The question really boils down to when will we see affordable high
voltage ADCs. The problem is that every signal in the input passband
is in series and the [peak] voltage adds as a vector sum. So if one
S9+63dB (-10 dBm) signal causes the ADC to overflow (consistent with
the noise loading limit in the AB4OJ/VA7OJ tests of the Flex-6000
series) the ADC limit is 0.1V (peak) at the antenna. Spread that 0.1V
across multiple [equal strength] signals and you see the following:
N "S"
----------------------------------
1 S9 +63 dB (-10 dBm)
3 S9 +53 dB
10 S9 +43 dB
32 S9 +33 dB
100 S9 +23 dB
316 S9 +13 dB
~450 S9 +10 dB
1000 S9 +3 dB
~1400 S9 +0 dB (-73 dBm)
Since it is the instantaneous peaks that cause problems, increasing
the number of signals decreases the frequency of the ADC overflows.
There
is certainly analysis that can be done to compute the probability of a
peak given a specific number of signals and frequency distribution but
my best guess is that the number of signals involved will be somewhere
between 10 and 100. Of course, if one of those signals is very strong
- a 1.5 KW neighbor 0.5 miles away or a broadcast station that puts
a few volts on any wire in the air - it does not take many (if any)
additional S9+10 dB signals to push the system over the edge.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.6086 / Virus Database: 4419/10649 - Release Date:
09/16/15
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
