There is another frontier. That is noise/RFI reduction.
The Pandora's box of RFI has been opened and can't be shut at this point.
We need to address the issue of noise reduction and noise blanketing in
some quantitative way to compare various RX's. Right now the
"comparisons" are all innuendo, e.g. "my old xyz rig did a much better
job at noise blanketing power line noise than my new widget." The
recent QST article on the K3S singing the praises (without giving any
data) of its NR and NB capability is another example.
This would be tough since the world of RFI sources is huge. It would
take some real effort to quantify the world of noise sources and their
signatures and then find some algorithms to deal with them. Impossible?
The world of big data isn't so big any more. Such an catalog might be
doable. Algorithms are another issue. My hope is that NR/NB could be
made adaptive to recognize the signature(s) and generate appropriate
algorithms on the fly.
There are a lot of smart people out there who could perhaps address
these issues. Unfortunately commercial interests have to see some
payoff. They haven't as of yet. The fact that AM broadcasters are
being burned by RFI and becoming proactive is a plus.
73 de Brian/K3KO
On 10/25/2016 14:32 PM, Bill Frantz wrote:
Before I bought my K3, I discussed the radio with someone in the booth
at Radiofest, a small hamfest held near Monterey, CA. After I had
learned a very little bit about the radio, I had my wife (KI6SLX), a
retired QA engineer for Apple, discuss UI issues. When she said it
seemed OK, I wrote a check.
I like Brian's idea of simulating contest conditions to test receivers.
Such a simulation would need to be reproducible and good enough that it
can't be gamed. For testing CW reception, perhaps a fixed set of signals
modulated through a very linear SSB modulator would work. That could
give at least 2KHz of signals for the receiver to handle.
The West Valley Amateur Radio Association field day operation sometimes
has 3 signals active on one band (CW, digital, and SSB). We manage to
get by running QRP with K3(S)s, KX3s, K2s and carefully placed antennas.
For CQP, we managed to run two stations on a band at 100 watts with
similar equipment and techniques.
73 Bill AE6JV
On 10/25/16 at 5:45 AM, [email protected] (brian) wrote:
I want to know how well a receiver is able to separate a weak signal
from strong signals 50-100 Hz away. It would be interesting to
speculate how such a measurement would be done. Let the RX use
whatever analog or digital tricks it can to achieve the above.
Your idea of simulating a contest with a hundreds of signal injected
at various random frequencies to gauge RX performance has merit.
Have you overlooked the MM, FD and DXpedition RX uses which in fact
push the dynamic range and mixing limits today? There are MM stations
which operate two transmitters on the same band.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | Re: Computer reliability, performance, and security:
408-356-8506 | The guy who *is* wearing a parachute is *not* the
www.pwpconsult.com | first to reach the ground. - Terence Kelly
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
