I assume that Don means a 30Hz wide peak below.
While I have found APF to be good for digging out weak CW
signals near the noise level, I have found a 50-100Hz bandwidth
works better when there are nearby strong signals. (I have the
250Hz crystal filter.) The K3 won't let me narrow the DSP filter
that much with APF on, probably for good reason. Am I missing a
way to use APF in these tight spaced conditions?
73 Bill AE6JV
On 10/25/16 at 8:31 AM, [email protected] (Don Wilhelm) wrote:
Just how much improvement is gained for each receiver is open
to some question, and depends on what tools are available and
used. Certainly the K3(S) APF function would be of help with
its 30Hz peak, but if testing is to be conducted using very
closely spaced multiple signals, then it would be necessary to
specify which of the interference abatement tools were used on
each receiver...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | When it comes to the world | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506 | around us, is there any choice | 16345
Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com | but to explore? - Lisa Randall | Los Gatos,
CA 95032
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
