I would like to know more about your receive antenna. At my home, I deal with 
S7-S9+ noise and am looking for some way to be able to operate besides FT8.

Thanks…

David Thompson, AG7TX
Jack of All Trades
Master of None
[email protected]




> On Oct 28, 2019, at 14:31, Drew AF2Z <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> My RX antenna is a pair of small amplified stacked loops. It uses the LZ1AQ 
> amplifier board fed with common FTP (foil twisted pair) cable, which provides 
> the supply voltage, control lines and a shielded twisted pair for the signal. 
> I don't think you can get any better noise isolation than that.
> 
> It is a lot quieter than my transmitting antennas; lower signal levels as 
> well, but often a better signal-to-noise ratio than the transmit antennas.
> 
> 73,
> Drew
> AF2Z
> 
> 
> On 10/26/19 10:11, Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP wrote:
>> Jim,
>> I have to disagree about balanced line. Unlike coax, both conductors are 
>> exposed to external RF fields, so common mode noise will be rejected. If the 
>> antenna and line are properly balanced (not always easy to do, I admit) and 
>> if it is fed through a balanced antenna tuner, there is no reason for it to 
>> be noisier than coax. Yes, it can't be choked, but it doesn't need to be.
>> My antenna is a 10m long rotary dipole fed with open line. It has gone 
>> through several iterations and I've been very careful to install the line so 
>> that it is perpendicular to the antenna for as far as possible, etc. I've 
>> tried various balun arrangements, but the system that works best, both for 
>> reducing RF in the shack when transmitting and noise immunity when 
>> receiving, is a Johnson kW Matchbox.
>> There is a building taller than mine a few hundred meters away from it, and 
>> a very distinct noise peak when the antenna is turned toward it, which seems 
>> to indicate that the noise is picked up by the antenna, not the line. I 
>> notice the same noise peak with a coax-fed shielded loop antenna, so it is 
>> definitely coming from the building, and isn't an artifact of the alignment 
>> of the antenna to the line.  I am pretty sure I have at least a 10 dB 
>> difference in noise when a band is open (at least, when the antenna is not 
>> aimed at that building), but I will wait until the band is solidly dead 
>> tonight to check that out.
>> My pattern is a form of figure 8 on 40-10 meters, but you are right that you 
>> can't maintain the pattern over a greater frequency range.
>> My main point is that there is nothing inherently noisy about a two-wire 
>> transmission line!
>> 73,
>> Victor, 4X6GP
>> Rehovot, Israel
>> Formerly K2VCO
>> CWops no. 5
>> http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
>> On 26-Oct-2019 10:32, Jim Brown wrote:
>>> On 10/25/2019 2:01 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote:
>>>> Except for my 6M yagi, all of my antennas are non-resonant antennas. My 
>>>> favorite is the 256 ft center fed wire {resonant at 1.825 MHz} with a 
>>>> balanced feed.
>>> 
>>> Dean Straw, N6BV, retired editor of the ARRL Antenna Book and Antenna 
>>> Compendiums, is a very smart engineer and a very good friend. But his 
>>> promotion of this sort of antenna is probably the greatest error of his 
>>> time in that job, an idea whose time is LONG past, for many reasons. 
>>> Primary -- 1) it cannot be choked to kill noise on RX, and 99.9% of hams 
>>> live surrounded by local noise and 2) it's pattern is different on every 
>>> frequency.
>>> 
>>> I am a strong believer in resonant antennas for each band, if if the must 
>>> be multi-band antennas like fan dipoles to fit in the available space. For 
>>> example, a 20/15/10 fan fits in 33 ft and works great, with a predictable 
>>> pattern on each band. An 80/40 fan works on 15M, with a predictable pattern 
>>> on both 80 and 40. Hypower Antenna company sells loaded antennas that are 
>>> resonant on 80 and 40 and fit into about 100 ft; I used one in Chicago on 
>>> 30 to great effect. All of these antennas are fed with 50 or 75 ohm coax, 
>>> and CAN be choked to kill RX noise.
>>> 
>>> RX noise is a VERY big deal -- if you can't hear 'em, you can't work 'em. 
>>> If you haven't worked to minimize your RX noise, you're DXing with one hand 
>>> tied behind your back! My friend AG6EE goes to remote locations in NV, OR, 
>>> and CA to light up rare grids with 1kW on 6M. Folks trying to work him 
>>> complain of one-way propagation because he hears them really well and the 
>>> don't hear him, but the REAL problem is their local RX noise.
>>> 
>>> http://k9yc.com/KillingReceiveNoise.pdf  Text, NCJ article
>>> http://k9yc.com/KillingRXNoiseVisalia.pdf  Slides Visalia talk
>>> 
>>> 73, Jim K9YC
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [email protected]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected] 

Reply via email to