Oh, I think I understand the distinction your making now.
On 7/9/07 09:12, "Ian J Maude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: > David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote: >> Isn't an inverted V balanced? - Sorry, I'm still new to this - SGC certainly >> does tune balanced antennas afaik - there are lots of examples of that >> quoted in the forums. >> > The antenna *could* be balanced, dependent on what you feed it with. > The SCG tuner will tune balanced aerial systems but is not AFAIK a > balanced tuner. > > Ian >> In the manual (http://www.sgcworld.com/Publications/Manuals/237man.pdf), >> page 22 shows both a dipole and an inverted V. >> >> >> On 7/9/07 08:29, "Ian J Maude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: >> >> >>> David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote: >>> >>>> Doesn't an SGC fit this bill? I use an SG237 to tune a portable inverted V >>>> fed by 300ohm (or thereabouts) ribbon - arms cut at 20m, on a 10m >>>> telescopic >>>> pole and it tunes up on 80m - 10m a treat. >>>> >>>> Am I missing something in your post? >>>> >>>> >>> Yes, you are missing the word 'balanced' :-) >>> >>> Ian >>> >> >> > -- When I am working on a problem I never think about beauty. I only think about how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong. -R. Buckminster Fuller, engineer, designer, and architect (1895-1983) _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
