-----Original Message-----
From: Goody K3NG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Another thing to note is that ARRL buys all the gear they review,
right off the shelf just like any other ham would.

And it's bought in such a way that the seller doesn't know it's going to be an ARRL test unit.

--

As for "fluff" in ARRL Product Reviews, I attribute that to the wide 'dynamic range' of the readership's technical
knowledge.

On the one end are hams who can recite testing methodologies for all sorts of performance metrics, including pitfalls and claimed-vs-observed numbers. At the other end are hams who don't understand why you'd want passband tuning, narrow filters, or what the attenuator/preamp switch does. And everything in between.

On top of that are complaints that QST is "too technical" and/or "aimed only at the contest/DX/big station hams",
etc., etc.

So we get Product Reviews that are part lab test, part feelings, and part an attempt to Elmer. All jammed into a
limited space, and on a limited time, to be done by a limited staff.

The K2 got an expanded report that only appeared online. Went into more detail than the mag report. K3 should
get the same.

One ham's fluff is another ham's main interest.

73 de Jim, N2EY
________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to