Look, I'm an Elecraft customer (K2) and love their products and what 
they've done to restore kitbuilding with quality products.  I'm also 
trying to be an owner of the K3 – you know how that's going.  So to 
the extent what I've said is viewed as critical, it's meant to be 
helpful for the future.

In dealing with customers, it's always best to understate and 
overperform.  Take Dell Computers for example.  I've purchased maybe 
two dozen systems from them in the last ten years.  Every time I 
ordered a new system, they gave me a ship date.  Every time, they 
delivered the system PRIOR to that ship date.  They set my 
expectation low and then beat it by a wide margin.  

How do you think that experience makes me feel about Dell, versus how 
I now feel about Elecraft?   How much trust is there that Dell will 
do what it says, versus Elecraft?

I agree that once Elecraft got themselves (and their customers) into 
a "repeatedly failed expectations scenario" with missed delivery 
dates, it was better to delay than ship a defective product.  And 
yes, premature shipments happen way too much in the electronics 
industry and cost everyone, customers and producers alike.

However, Elecraft would have done much better to follow the Dell 
model: never promise more than you can deliver, promise less and 
deliver more.  

Some unethical companies, of course, pre-announce products way before 
their release, in order to freeze the market and prevent customers 
from buying competitors' products that actually are available.  I'm 
not at all suggesting Elecraft intended that (though they may have 
had that effect).  

My point is that Elecraft hurt both themselves and their customers by 
creating repeatedly jilted expectations, and my earlier post 
described how and why I believe that occurred: changing their 
business model from kits to finished products – a much more demanding 
enterprise - without ramping up and properly managing the process to 
ensure success.  The goal is for that not to happen again in the 
future, because it's bad for all concerned.

I want the K3 and Elecraft to be hugely successful, but for too long 
now we've all been in limbo on that issue.

Les  WB6MND





--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/5/2007 12:29:53 P.M.  Pacific Standard Time, 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> A minor correction to your  minor correction.
> 
> My statement was that Elecraft AS A COMPANY is  inexperienced 
dealing 
> with contractors. 
> 
> It's clear from what's  happened with the K3 that even if an 
> individual at Elecraft had SOME  experience in "another life" with 
> outside contractors, it wasn't enough  experience to correctly 
handle 
> this situation.
> 
> There are thousands of  ways contractors outside can mess up, cause 
> damage and then hide the damage  until it's too late. It takes lots 
> of accumulated experience to sidestep the  landmines â€" large 
companies 
> have entire departments that do nothing but  monitor suppliers' 
> status â€" obviously Elecraft couldn't or didn't do this.  As a 
> company, Elecraft stepped in the landmines.
> 
> Les WB6MND
> 
> I know I'm just a little biased toward Elecraft, but they have done 
quite  
> well for what they started with the K3.
> I have managed programs in what we call rocket science and high 
tech of the  
> nth degree for 40 years and had just as much trouble with first run 
PCBs - 
> even  when there were only 2 or 3 to be made.  It's a tough game 
and outsource is 
>  still in it's infancy. Have you ever noticed how many versions of 
highly  
> popular Computer motherboards turn out to be lemons and the rate at 
which  they 
> are rolled up in revision? These are devices that are sold by 
hundreds of  
> thousands and using standardized buses and common components. Main 
reason is the  
> pressure to get them to market and the belief that firmware will 
fix any 
> minor  problems. I praise Elecraft for having the strength to see 
this through the 
>  toughest part of a new product rollout.
>  
> Al WA6VNN
> Al WA6VNN
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************** See what's new at 
http://www.aol.com
>




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Elecraft_K3/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Elecraft_K3/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to