At 12:36 PM 27/03/08, you wrote:
Rethink the kit. I got mine in kit form, #501, and it isn't right yet.
OTOH, when I received my kit, I was dreading the assembly
process. I have built many kits and home-brew transceivers through
the years, so the enjoyment of step-by-step assembly was lost many
years ago. I enjoy the design and modification exercises, but not
the assembly.
HI Paul,
I was looking forward to the kit experience, no reservations at all.
Having built 2 k2's and a K1 and enjoying every minute of it, I was
ready for the K3. I already had the anti static gear and tools, so
there was no extra expense involved.
However, I am now very glad I purchased the K3 kit. The assembly
allowed me to become better acquainted with the transceiver. I
have developed a whole new level of respect for Eric, Wayne and
everyone else responsible for the design and product launch. The
turning point for me was after about an hour of assembly time. At
that point, I was getting used to finding all the small hardware,
even without measurements, and the work-flow really accelerated.
Getting to where the Elecraft group is today was no trivial
undertaking and something I could probably spend a lifetime
attempting and never get very far.
I enjoyed the assembly too. But here is the point I was making.
Nothing is perfect 100% of the time. I happened to get the one K3
that had some problems. It's not like the K1 or 2, with
voltage/resistance charts and full blown schematics. So unless you
have the service manual and some higher end test equipment, well,
back to the factory it goes. That's not a problem either, if you
don't mind $50 for shipping and insurance, plus the task of packaging
and shipping. My point was that if you get an assembled K3, factory
tested and ready to go, your chances of having a problem are about
zero. A kit K3 could have a problem when shipped or a problem could
be induced by the builder. Seeing I have #501, and I've not heard of
any other K3 kit problems, I'd say the odds of having a kit problem
are about 1 in 500.
BTW, I have a redux modification of the rear panel SO-239
connectors. I was heavily abused in private e-mail by folks who
criticized my photography skills and I hope to do a better job with
manual focus when I show the results of the next phase of
changes. I ultimately decided to use two sections of RG-316 coax
between the SO-239 panel connectors and the KAT3 board. I replaced
the 0.5" #4 aluminum spacer used to hold the KAT3 firmly in place
(also functions to form the return RF path) with a Nylon spacer to
force all return RF onto the RG-316 cabling. Also, if there's any
improvement in ANT1 to ANT2 port isolation, I'll pass along the results.
At least you could switch between ANT1 and 2, I couldn't....all I'd
get is a diagnostic msg saying NO ATU. That's frustrating when you
have tried two ATU's in the rig.
John
k7up
Paul, W9AC
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
