Oh here we go again....Stop trolling for flames guys. Now we will start this
same old argument again. If one is so concerned about how much bandwidth
they use then switch to QRP CW and forget about SSB.
Steve Ellington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Tippett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 10:24 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - ESSB Availability
Every time I see the term ESSB I see red. I wonder if these folks
have ever read FCC Part 97.307 (a) Emission Standards:
(a) No amateur station transmission shall occupy more bandwidth than
necessary for the information rate and emission type being
transmitted, in accordance with good amateur practice.
http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/news/part97/
Instead of playing wannabe broadcast engineer, why don't these folks
try something really creative, like trying to see how *little*
bandwidth they can use to communicate, instead of how much bandwidth
they can consume?
Icom has a lot of faults (like very misleading advertising) but I do
commend them for limiting the bandwidth of their voice modes.
End of rant.
73, Bill W4ZV
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.24.3/1472 - Release Date: 5/29/2008
7:27 AM
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
