When I was commenting on the NR, I did not have CW in mind particularly. Definitely not NR in a narrow CW-filter situation. Lyle's explanation of NR seems logical to me.
What I expect the NR to do is: enhancing the copyablility of SSB signals that are in the local noise and barely understandable. Engaging the NR at the present situation, I can hear something happening to the audio at the different settings, but it does NOT make the signal sound better copyable. But if the NR is only for further de-noising already good signals... then I set my expectations are too high. Please tell me I'm wrong here. 73, Arie PA3A (using last version beta SW) -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Bill W4ZV Verzonden: donderdag 20 november 2008 12:42 Aan: [email protected] Onderwerp: Re: [Elecraft] K3 NR (was making K3 RX audio like K2) Arie Kleingeld PA3A-2 wrote: > > > > I agree on the observation of the NR. > Up till now I have not been able to find a setting that gives me a > real improvement. The NB is very good, but I find the NR > disappointing. Any advice from list members is appriciated, or is the > solution in improving the NR algorithms? > You may simply be expecting too much of NR. It cannot overcome the basic physics of noise bandwidth. If you're already at a narrow CW bandwidth, it will do very little except confuse you. N.B. #6 below. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
