Ed I agree. I have no idea what these people are talking about. I've had a lot of radios. My last was the IC-7800 which sat beside the K3 for a month until I sold it. I can't imagine what this noise is that people think they hear. Perhaps a .wav file from someone would be helpful.
Steve N4LQ n...@carolina.rr.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Muns" <w...@msn.com> To: <Elecraft@mailman.qth.net> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 12:03 AM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Noisy K3 receiver >> I've had #1823 for just over a year, and I still don't like >> the sound of the receiver. That's the reason the K3 sat in a >> box for months while my trusty FT-1000mkV sat on the >> operating desk (until the MkV went on strike in the middle of >> the SS CW :-( > > I've read all the posts in this thread and have to say ... I just don't > "get > it". What noise?! If anything my two K3s are too quiet! It has occurred > to me more than once that I might have an antenna disconnected or perhaps > blew out the front-end to the radio. The most distinguishing > characteristic > of the K3 (for me) is how quiet it is when you slip on the headphones. > The > K3 is distinctively quiet compared all the Icom, Yaesu and Kenwood radios > I > own or have operated. I now realize that all the pre-K3 radios I've used > were somehow amplifying or emphasizing the band noise, plus adding a bunch > of digital artifacts, in the audio. I am completely stunned by the posts > here that report "noisy K3 receiver" and escaping to a "quieter" Japanese > radio. > > I've been using K3s 11 and 17 ever since the field test units first came > out. I've kept current with all the updates and mods so despite the early > serial numbers, these radios are equivalent to what is currently shipping. > I always have the latest field test firmware in both radios. This is > pre-Beta and pre-production firmware that has never interfered with my use > of the radio. I use the radios primarily for CW, RTTY and (rarely) SSB > contesting, plus a bit of DXing. It took me a full month of using the K3 > to > finally accept the fact that its receiver is so incredibly quiet compared > to > any other radio. I thought something was wrong! And yet with the greatly > reduced band noise in the headphones, extremely weak signal are easy to > copy. 80 and 160 are like new bands, more like the higher bands, with my > K3s. And the pile-up/crowded band receive capability is far superior to > any > radio I've ever operated. > > I'm not doubting the reports here on the reflector about "noisy K3 > receiver", but I have to say that either the specific radio has a major > defect or the various gain and AGC controls are not setup correctly. W4ZV > has posted on this reflector several excellent explanations on how to > properly adjust the K3, or any radio for that matter. I would love to > hear > one of these "noisy K3 receivers" and see how they are configured. > > Ed - W0YK > ----------------------------------------------- > Ed Muns > Muns Vineyard - www.munsvineyard.com > FaceBook - www.facebook.com/munsvineyard > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.716 / Virus Database: 270.14.112/2571 - Release Date: 12/17/09 14:40:00 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html