Why do you say that these photos and videos demonstrate why the integral P3 is a winner over a PC based panadapter? I came to the opposite conclusion but I'm willing to wait for more information. If you want to run anything else on the PC based on the K3 IF output, CWSkimmer for example, you would still need something like LP-PAN and a high sample rate audio card. If you make that investment, I don't know why you would also buy a P3 when it really doesn't seem to do anything that PowerSDR-IF (which is free) can't do. It aso seems that there is no mouse control for the P3 which I think is a drawback. I admit that I would like that 'toy' but I don't think I could justify buying it solely based on a capability that exceeds what can be done with a PC which I don't think it has. Now, if you just WANT it, I can understand that. Boys really do like their toys.
73, Ted, W2ZK On 2/15/2010 7:18 AM, David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote: > I want one - I've wanted one since it was muted, about the 1st week the K3 > was announced. > Now I really WANT one - thanks everyone for taking the pictures. > I think this demonstrates why the 'integral' P3 is a winner over a PC based > Pan-adapter. > > BTW, did I say I Want One? > > 73 de M0XDF, K3 #174 > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
