On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:05:11 -0600, Grant Youngman wrote: <<< There is plenty of research around that demonstrates that infrasonic content between 20-80Hz contributes to a less tiring listening environment, >>>
The big problem I notice with a lot of signals containing a lot of bass, is the stability of some rigs, and tuning skills. Unless you are zero beat on frequency, the bass sounds horrible. If some operators could learn how to tune, and make sure their offsets were aligned properly it wouldn't be as much of a problem. I was listening to two stations on 20 today, and for some reason they couldn't seem to zero beat with those $10K radios. Lot's of bass on the audio, so I had to crank the filter down to 2.4kHz to get the audio to sound decent. It was that or continually tune each station. At 2.4 they both sounded fine. I find myself cranking the filter width to below 2.7 a lot, just to cut out the weird sounding bass as the stations drift. :>) But enough of that. We don't need an ESSB vs Tin Can debate. -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/K3-transmit-equalizer-settings-tp4615446p4623019.html Sent from the [K3] mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
