Hi Ted: I personally like your idea and I would benefit from it. I realize that it would be something you could turn on or off via the CONFIG or MENU or DISPLAY buttons. I also realize that RIT/XIT give you this feature but if you have the SUB RX installed it's more likely that you will want to use VFO B.
I don't get all of the negative comments. How does having an available option negatively affect anybody. For example, I have not found AFX to be useful but I see no reason to complain about its existence. It's just a tool in the arsenal that I might find beneficial one day. Now if you really want to see some fireworks, suggest an APF (audio peak filter) for CW. 73, Mike K2MK > > > Ted Roycraft > Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:19:44 -0700 > > I think it might be useful at times if the frequency of VFO B could be > displayed as an offset from VFO A (optionally of course). For example, > if VFO A is set to 10.113.28 and VFO B is set to 10.114.34, then, if > that option were turned on, instead of displaying VFO B's frequency as > 10.114.34, it would display as +1.06. This could be useful in SPLIT > operation. No big deal, just a thought. > > 73, Ted, W2ZK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
