I think the problem may be the perception that the size of the width indicators on the display is infinitely variable. Those appear to be individual designed segments, as are the letter segments. It is not an LCD screen with all images made from a graphics processor generating pixel-based images, which could be varied to anything in software.
One can see all the segments and everything that can be shown on the display by tapping MENU, turning VFO B to LCD ADJ, and turning VFO A counter-clockwise until all the segments light up. Displaying anything else would seem to involve replacing the display and the code that drives it. Elecraft would have to comment as to the facts of that choice, though I would speculate that there is cost, coding complexity, space, possibly internal noise considerations, and that keeping dedicated segments updated occupies far less processor time and code than graphics generation for an LCD, and they have chosen to concentrate that power on signal processing. 73, Guy. On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Mike <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmmmm.... I dunno what happened here. My reply to Joe shows up under > Lyle's post, and my response to Lyle doesn't show at all. I checked the > address lines on the posts in my 'Sent' box and all three have the > individual's name and Elecraft. > > Did you get it Lyle? > > 73, Mike NF4L > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
