Wed Jul 14 09:06:04 EDT 2010 Guy Olinger (K2AV) wrote ...
... it's not a contesting bandwidth, more a pleasant casual operating
bandwidth ... my SSB 1.8 roofing filter with DSP set to 750 does as well ...
Wed Jul 14 09:36:33 EDT 2010 Jim Brown (K9YC) wrote ...
You're trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist, at least not for most
of us.
--- - - - ---
Guy,
Not everyone has a 1.8 kHz filter and not everyone operates CW contests.
And yes the whole idea for 750 Hz was that it offers a "pleasant casual
operating" width, and for some operators might be preferred versus INRAD's
existing 500 Hz filter (which is too narrow) and their 1 kHz filter (which
is too wide).
Jim,
The fact that the problem "doesn't exist" "for most of us" doesn't
negate the fact that there are folks who feel differently. Some simply
think it's a good idea, while others are eager to purchase such a filter
today if were it available!
73,
Gary KI4GGX
K3 #2724
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
