We're talking roofing filters here, not operating bandwidth. The functional difference between a 750 Hz roofing filter and a DSP setting of 750Hz versus a 1000 Hz roofing filter and a DSP setting of 750Hz is just plain trivial ... ESPECIALLY in a non-contest environment. At least it seems Inrad understands that.
73, Dave AB7E On 7/14/2010 7:21 AM, Gary Hvizdak wrote: > Guy, > > Not everyone has a 1.8 kHz filter and not everyone operates CW contests. > And yes the whole idea for 750 Hz was that it offers a "pleasant casual > operating" width, and for some operators might be preferred versus INRAD's > existing 500 Hz filter (which is too narrow) and their 1 kHz filter (which > is too wide). > > > Jim, > > The fact that the problem "doesn't exist" "for most of us" doesn't > negate the fact that there are folks who feel differently. Some simply > think it's a good idea, while others are eager to purchase such a filter > today if were it available! > > > 73, > Gary KI4GGX > K3 #2724 > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
