Dave Ketchum wrote: > To anyone else reading, my claim is: > With the Condorcet method(s), the voter ranks all > candidates liked better than "last" (optionally including ranking "last").
Is it necessary for a voter to rank ALL candidates? Does it cease to be "a Condorcet method" if voters have the option to truncate at their respective points of indifference? James Gilmour ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
