Re: [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method.

[David Catchpole]

On Sun, 24 Oct 1999, Donald E Davison wrote:

>      There are people who support small district STV and/or Droop Quota
> and/or exhausted ballots being given to the remaining candidates. These
> three features make STV less proportional. One or more of them would not
> allow the Eight Percent Group to elect any members, but they would allow
> the Forty-Eight Percent Group to elect fifty-eight members per hundred.

Droop doesn't do that. Give me an example where it does.