election-methods-list  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing Markus Schulze
  • Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing Bart Ingles
  • Re: FPTP ...) In STV 2nd preference won't harm 1st choice Craig Carey
  • Re: FPTP ...) In STV 2nd preference won't harm 1st choice Bart Ingles
  • Re: FPTP ...) In STV 2nd preference won't harm 1st choice David Catchpole
  • Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing Craig Carey
  • Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing DEMOREP1
  • Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing DEMOREP1
  • Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing Markus Schulze
• [EM] The family of "regular" probabilistic (stochastic) electoral systems David Catchpole
• [EM] Arizona To Pioneer Internet Voting DEMOREP1
• [EM] New Zealand District Winners DEMOREP1
• [EM] It is folly to make false claims for any reform. Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] It is folly to make false claims for any reform. Blake Cretney
• [EM] Recall of a lawmaker member. Donald E Davison
• [EM] message rejected Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] message rejected Steve Eppley
• [EM] To Craig Carey: The Freedom Party's Vice President Donald E Davison
• [EM] Re: The MMPP MMP method DEMOREP1
• [EM] An Improvement in Representative Democracy Donald E Davison
• [EM] Accountability under MMP: The New Zealand experience (FWD) DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Accountability under.. ] The MMPP MMP method Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Accountability under.. ] The MMPP MMP method David Catchpole
• [EM] Cambridge, Mass 1999 City Council PR Results DEMOREP1
• [EM] New Zealand Results DEMOREP1
• [EM] Country election systems DEMOREP1
• [EM] Proportional Representation and Accountability Donald E Davison
• [EM] Riding along on a GIF file, honey... David Catchpole
• RE: Gerrymandering Hare DEMOREP1
• [EM] FWD - Update from the Center for Voting and Democracy Donald E Davison
• [EM] Gerrymandering Hare was: More religious chanting by David Blake Cretney
• [EM] Two Suggested Systems of STV/Open Party List Donald E Davison
• [EM] Internet Voting at UC Davis (FWD) DEMOREP1
• [EM] Washington State-- County Internet Voting Test (FWD) DEMOREP1
• [EM] NZ's Labour ahead, etc. (FWD) DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] NZ's Labour ahead, etc. (FWD) David Catchpole
• [EM] More religious chanting by David Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Two New STV Features - New to Me; Exhausted votes Craig Carey
• [EM] Droop Equation Corrected Donald E Davison
• 0 Condorcet winners was: [EM] "No splitting rule" Blake Cretney
• [EM] Droop as a Religious Belief Donald E Davison
  • [EM] Hare-STV not proven better than Droop-STV Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Droop as a Religious Belief David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] Droop as a Religious Belief Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Droop as a Religious Belief David Catchpole
• [EM] Political Parties and Proportional Representation Donald E Davison
• [EM] "No splitting rule" David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] "No splitting rule" Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] "No splitting rule" David Catchpole
• [EM] Droop's role in electing `Most Preferred Candidates' Donald E Davison
• [EM] STV should be a better method. Donald E Davison
• [EM] FWD - [ER] The Elecctions Reform List has moved Donald E Davison
• [EM] RE: A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members DEMOREP1
  • [EM] RE: A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members DEMOREP1
  • [EM] RE: A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] RE: A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members David Catchpole
• RE: A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members DEMOREP1
  • RE: A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members DEMOREP1
• [EM] A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members David Catchpole
• [EM] Internet Voting To Be Tested in 2000 Election DEMOREP1
• [EM] California Internet Voting Initiative (CIVI) petition DEMOREP1
• [EM] A Valid Reason to have a Lower Quota Donald E Davison
• [EM] Australia Votes To Keep Queen DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Australia Votes To Keep Queen David Catchpole
• [EM] Gerrymander Wars 1999 DEMOREP1
• [EM] Let's move Congress back home to where they belong. Donald E Davison
• [EM] FWD - different election methods Donald E Davison
• [EM] Christopher Hitchens, "Our Rigged Elections" Tom Round
  • Re: [EM] Christopher Hitchens, "Our Rigged Elections" Bart Ingles
• [EM] Iowa to put Internet voting to the test (FWD) DEMOREP1
• [EM] 10/30/99 - Comments on Schulze's example. Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] 10/30/99 - Comments on Schulze's example. David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] 10/30/99 - Comments on Schulze's example. Markus Schulze
• [EM] How to Draw Gerrymander Plans DEMOREP1
• [EM] Population per seat chart DEMOREP1
• [EM] ONTARIO 1999 MINORITY RULE SUMMARY DATA DEMOREP1
• [EM] Ontario June 3, 1999 Summary Gerrymander Election Results DEMOREP1
• [EM] NZ voters urged to back majority, one-party rule DEMOREP1
• [EM] 10/28 - The Redemption of David Catchpole Donald E Davison
  • [EM] The Last Temptation of David Catchpole- rated R David Catchpole
• [EM] 10/27 - David Catchpole and his STV/MMP hybrid Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] 10/27 - David Catchpole and his STV/MMP hybrid David Catchpole
• [EM] Senators Want Nomination Changes DEMOREP1
• [EM] Winning the Reform Party's Nomination Is Not Simple DEMOREP1
• [EM] David Catchpole's Droop Quota [???] Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] David Catchpole's Droop Quota [???] David Catchpole
• [EM] Re: STV is suppose to be a PR method. DEMOREP1
  • [EM] Re: STV is suppose to be a PR method. DEMOREP1
• [EM] Replies to Craig Carey and David Catchpole Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Replies to Craig Carey and David Catchpole Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Replies to Craig Carey and David Catchpole David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] Replies to Craig Carey and David Catchpole Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Replies to Craig Carey and David Catchpole Blake Cretney
• [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method. Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method. Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method. David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method. David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method. Tom Round
  • Re: [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method. Markus Schulze
• [EM] Voting Demorep's proxies both yes and no, in proportion to district. Donald E Davison
• [EM] David Catchpole and his STV/MMP hybrid Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] David Catchpole and his STV/MMP hybrid David Catchpole
• RE: What is a wasted vote in a STV election?? DEMOREP1
• [EM] What is a wasted vote in a STV election?? Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] What is a wasted vote in a STV election?? pct0039
• [EM] Re: Proportional means equal portions of the whole. DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Re: Proportional means equal portions of the whole. David Catchpole
  • [EM] Re: Proportional means equal portions of the whole. DEMOREP1
• Re: Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet. Craig Carey
  • Re: Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet. David Catchpole
  • Re: Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet. Craig Carey
  • Re: Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet. Craig Carey
  • Re: Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet. David Catchpole
  • Re: Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet. David Catchpole
• [EM] Proportional means equal portions of the whole. Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Proportional means equal portions of the whole. David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] Proportional means equal portions of the whole. Tom Round
  • Re: [EM] Proportional means equal portions of the whole. Bart Ingles
• [EM] Drawing P.R. Districts DEMOREP1
• [EM] An Election is not over until It's Over Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] An Election is not over until It's Over David Catchpole
• RE: Hare, Droop and MEP DEMOREP1
• [EM] SNTV and Bottoms Up and Lowering the Numbers Donald E Davison
• [EM] Tom said: "It's cheating to deem the votes..." Donald E Davison
• [EM] Update on Mike Ossipoff Donald E Davison
• [EM] Bart questions Ideal Condition of no exhausted ballots Donald E Davison
• [EM] Proxy Voting DEMOREP1
• Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet. David Catchpole
  • Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet. David Catchpole
  • Clarification Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet. David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet. David Catchpole
• [EM] Hare, Droop and MEP DEMOREP1
• [EM] `Lowering the Numbers' is a major flaw of STV Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] `Lowering the Numbers' is a major flaw of STV David Catchpole
• [EM] Tom Round's `yesterday' post is lost Donald E Davison
  • [EM] Tom Round's `yesterday' post is lost Tom Round
• [EM] TV Voting DEMOREP1
• [EM] Re: Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule DEMOREP1
  • [EM] Re: Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule DEMOREP1
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule????? [2] Tom Round
  • Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule????? [2] Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule????? [2] Bart Ingles
• [EM] FWD - Reply to DD via Judges and Juries Donald E Davison
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule David Catchpole
  • [EM] Parliamentary points of order Tom Round
  • Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Tom Round
  • Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Craig Carey
  • [EM] Maybe a new thread is in order: Cross-Tasman Catfight David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] Maybe a new thread is in order ... Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Maybe a new thread is in order ... David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Markus Schulze
• [EM] Robert Winters quotation on Droop Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Robert Winters quotation on Droop David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] Robert Winters quotation on Droop SibArn
  • Re: [EM] Robert Winters quotation on Droop Markus Schulze
• [EM] Proportional Representation and the Droop Quota Donald E Davison
• [EM] Why the Droop Quota is wrong Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Why the Droop Quota is wrong David Catchpole
  • RE: [EM] Why the Droop Quota is wrong Crabb, Deane (PIRSA)
• [EM] Re: Some are missing the point of the ballot `cockup' DEMOREP1
• [EM] Meek style STV - Part One of Two Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Meek style STV - Part One of Two David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] Meek style STV - Part One of Two Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Meek style STV - Part One of Two Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Meek style STV - Part One of Two Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Meek style STV - Part One of Two Craig Carey
  • [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet. David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet. David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet. Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet. David Catchpole
• RE: 3 Choices DEMOREP1
• [EM] Group Model Bylaws, 12 Oct 1999 DEMOREP1
• [EM] `Democracy is a beautiful thing, except...' Donald E Davison
• [EM] 3 Choices DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] 3 Choices Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] 3 Choices David Catchpole
• [EM] RE: Simple PR method DEMOREP1
• [EM] STV and having quotas to eliminate losers Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] STV and having quotas to eliminate losers David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] STV and having quotas to eliminate losers Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] STV and having quotas to eliminate losers David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] STV and having quotas to eliminate losers Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] STV and having quotas to eliminate losers Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] STV and having quotas to eliminate losers Craig Carey
• RE: [EM] Simple PR method Crabb, Deane (PIRSA)
• [EM] Some are missing the point of the ballot `cockup' Donald E Davison

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]