Mike Osipoff wrote:
> Here's an example where Margins fails the strong 1st Choice
> Criterion due to truncation. Numbers of voters don't add to 100.
>
> 101 50 75
> A B C
> B
A thought:
Mike supposes that A and C's real second choice is B, and B 'should'
win. If A truncates, C can only win if B does not truncate, or if C
has more support than A. If I were a C supporter, I'd seriously
consider truncating too. Then we have FPP.
It seems to me that it is the moderate party's supporters who have no
incentive to truncate. In MIke's example, if C is the real moderate
then it 'should' win, not B. So it margins so bad?
Under AV / IRO B's supporters have every incentive not to truncate
IN THIS CASE, else their vote may be wasted.
Cheers
Dave
--------------------------------------------------
Sorry, but apparently I have to do this. :-(
The views expressed above are entirely those of the writer
and do not represent the views, policy or understanding of
any other person or official body.
