election-methods-list  

Messages by Date

• 1999/04/15 [EM] More from Salva on Salva Voting Donald E Davison
• 1999/04/14 Re: [ER] Salva Voting - a single winner method Bart Ingles
• 1999/04/14 [EM] Salva Voting - a single winner method Donald E Davison
• 1999/04/12 Re: What do you call it? Donald E Davison
• 1999/04/12 RE: [EM] The Most Gain for the Smallest Change Wiseman, Julian
• 1999/04/11 [EM] The Most Gain for the Smallest Change Donald E Davison
• 1999/04/06 Re: [EM] What do you call it? David Catchpole
• 1999/04/06 [EM] What do you call it? Donald E Davison
• 1999/04/05 [EM] U.S. Congressional Elections, 1788-1997 book DEMOREP1
• 1999/04/05 [EM] CNN/IFES Election Watch DEMOREP1
• 1999/04/05 Re: [EM] Brits OK End to Hereditary Rights (FWD) Tom Round
• 1999/04/05 [EM] IPU Election Systems data DEMOREP1
• 1999/04/01 [EM] Brits OK End to Hereditary Rights (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 1999/03/28 [EM] HR 1173 DEMOREP1
• 1999/03/26 [EM] Israel P.R. system DEMOREP1
• 1999/03/25 [EM] Science News letters address Bart Ingles
• 1999/03/25 Re: [EM] FWD - How to Fix n Election David Catchpole
• 1999/03/25 Re: [EM] FWD - How to Fix n Election Bart Ingles
• 1999/03/25 [EM] FWD - How to Fix n Election Donald E Davison
• 1999/03/24 [EM] Bah Humbug... can someone prove/disprove a relationship for me? [g is rational (II)(n) on X implies g is rational (I)(n) on X] (fwd) Resent-Message-Id: <"g8Ows1.0.r-7.GiN-s"@mx1> David Catchpole
• 1999/03/22 Second Inevitable Correction Re: [EM] Can someone prove/disprove a relationship for me? [g is rational (II)(n) on X implies g is rational (I)(n) on X] David Catchpole
• 1999/03/22 [EM] Plan's changes result in new Single Seat method Donald E Davison
• 1999/03/21 Inevitable Correction Re: [EM] Can someone prove/disprove a relationship for me? [g is rational (II)(n) on X implies g is rational (I)(n) on X] David Catchpole
• 1999/03/21 Re: The "problem" with circularity (was Re: Reply to Blake Cretney) Bart Ingles
• 1999/03/21 [EM] Can someone prove/disprove a relationship for me? [g is rational (II)(n) on X implies g is rational (I)(n) on X] David Catchpole
• 1999/03/20 Re: Circular Stand-Off Markus Schulze
• 1999/03/19 [EM] Instant Consensus voting method, by Steve Eppley Donald E Davison
• 1999/03/19 [EM] Just In Time Withdrawal - JITW Donald E Davison
• 1999/03/19 Re: Circular Stand-Off Markus Schulze
• 1999/03/19 Re: Circular Stand-Off Markus Schulze
• 1999/03/19 [EM] Diversity of opinion is the key. Donald E Davison
• 1999/03/19 Re: - Re: Circular Stand - Off Donald E Davison
• 1999/03/19 [EM] Problems I have with Peters and Wakker (1991) "Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives and Revealed Group Preferences" in Econometrica Vol. 59 No. 6 David Catchpole
• 1999/03/18 [EM] A very basic question ... Tom Round
• 1999/03/18 Re: [EM] Persistent Majority (a new single-winner method) Donald E Davison
• 1999/03/18 Re: The "problem" with circularity (was Re: Reply to Blake Cretney) Markus Schulze
• 1999/03/18 Re: Riera and Borrell presentation (FWD) Rob Lanphier
• 1999/03/17 Re: The "problem" with circularity (was Re: Reply to Blake Cretney) David Catchpole
• 1999/03/17 Re: Truncating Condorcet's Ballots?? Steve Eppley
• 1999/03/17 Re: The "problem" with circularity (was Re: Reply to Blake Cretney) Steve Eppley
• 1999/03/17 Re: Circular Stand-Off Steve Eppley
• 1999/03/17 Re: Condorcet is Cute Steve Eppley
• 1999/03/17 [EM] Persistent Majority (a new single-winner method) Steve Eppley
• 1999/03/17 Re: Riera and Borrell presentation (FWD) Michael A. Schoenfield
• 1999/03/16 Re: Riera and Borrell presentation (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 1999/03/16 [EM] Riera and Borrell presentation (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 1999/03/16 [EM] Making the Party List Selection more Democratic Donald E Davison
• 1999/03/15 Re: [EM] Israeli party-list primary elections Markus Schulze
• 1999/03/15 [EM] Donald E Davison
• 1999/03/15 Re: [EM] Israeli party-list primary elections Markus Schulze
• 1999/03/12 [EM] Recall of a STV member and Direct Democracy Donald E Davison
• 1999/03/11 Re: [EM] Israeli party-list primary elections Tom Round
• 1999/03/07 [EM] Israeli party-list primary elections Tom Round
• 1999/03/07 [EM] CVD 3 single seat methods DEMOREP1
• 1999/03/07 [EM] Aargh, yet another Rob Lanphier
• 1999/03/07 Yet another test message Rob Lanphier
• 1999/03/06 Legislating who gets elected in France Ken & Karla
• 1999/03/06 3 FEC Electronic Voting items DEMOREP1
• 1999/03/05 CV&D Update Donald E Davison
• 1999/03/02 Re: Peters, H. and P. Wakker (1987) Independence of Irrelevant Alternativesand Revealed Group Preferences (mimeo, Limburg Rijksuniversite it) Ken & Karla
• 1999/03/01 Peters, H. and P. Wakker (1987) Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives and Revealed Group Preferences (mimeo, Limburg Rijksuniversiteit) David Catchpole
• 1999/02/28 Another test Rob Lanphier
• 1999/02/28 Test message(s) Rob Lanphier
• 1999/02/28 Re: Truncating Condorcet's Ballots Blake Cretney
• 1999/02/28 Unidentified subject! Blake Cretney
• 1999/02/28 Circular Stand-Off Donald E Davison
• 1999/02/28 The circularity problem (FWD) Markus Schulze
• 1999/02/27 Re: Condorcet is Cute Rob Lanphier
• 1999/02/26 Re: The "problem" with circularity (was Re: Reply to Blake Cretney) Markus Schulze
• 1999/02/26 Decision Table by Jim Lindsay Donald E Davison
• 1999/02/25 Condorcet Reversed DEMOREP1
• 1999/02/25 Truncating Condorcet's Ballots Donald E Davison
• 1999/02/25 Voter's Preferred Choice vs Lower Choices Donald E Davison
• 1999/02/24 Re: Condorcet is Cute Blake Cretney
• 1999/02/24 The "problem" with circularity (was Re: Reply to Blake Cretney) Steve Eppley
• 1999/02/24 Re: Condorcet is Cute Markus Schulze
• 1999/02/24 Condorcet is Cute Donald E Davison
• 1999/02/23 Circular Ties Blake Cretney
• 1999/02/23 Reply to Blake Cretney Donald E Davison
• 1999/02/22 No-Elimination example (FWD) Donald E Davison
• 1999/02/21 Re: Condorcet without Circular Ties?? - well, maybe!! Blake Cretney
• 1999/02/21 Re: Civil Rights Director Opposes NYC's anti-STV agenda Bart Ingles
• 1999/02/21 Condorcet without Circular Ties?? - well, maybe!! Donald E Davison
• 1999/02/19 RE: Civil Rights Director Opposes NYC's anti-STV agenda Lytton, Dennis
• 1999/02/19 Re: More info on "Just-in-Time Withdrawal" (JITW) Bart Ingles
• 1999/02/18 Re: More info on "Just-in-Time Withdrawal" (JITW) Donald E Davison
• 1999/02/17 Civil Rights Director Opposes NYC's anti-STV agenda Daniel Davis
• 1999/02/15 Code of Honor for Reform Activists Donald E Davison
• 1998/11/15 Cumulative and Limited Voting ??? New Democracy
• 1998/11/15 Re: [ER] Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/15 brief comments on 1CC definition Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/15 a few brief comments about 1CC Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/15 [ER] Re: Revealing the Majority Winner New Democracy
• 1998/11/15 A few criterion addenda Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/15 solid 1CC definition Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/15 Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/15 Re: [Fwd: MPV/IRO and equal rankings] Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/14 small typos Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/14 Simpler 1CC substitutes Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/14 1CC definitions were faulty. Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/14 Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Michael A. Schoenfield
• 1998/11/14 Re: [EM] Reply from Dan of Illinois Michael A. Schoenfield
• 1998/11/14 Another Election Plan- Proxy P.R. DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/14 U.S. H. Reps. Gerrymander Results 14 Nov 1998 DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/14 [EM] Suggested Election Plan for any State New Democracy
• 1998/11/14 Re: Revealing the Majority Winner DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/14 Re: Revealing the Majority Winner DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/14 Re: Another flaw in monotonicity Markus Schulze
• 1998/11/14 Schulze Method Markus Schulze
• 1998/11/13 Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Bart Ingles
• 1998/11/13 Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Wayne M. VanWeerthuizen
• 1998/11/13 U.K. Government Defeated Again, etc. (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/13 British Lords revolt against electoral reform (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/13 CUMULATIVE BULLSHIT Daniel Davis
• 1998/11/13 [EM] Reply from Dan of Illinois New Democracy
• 1998/11/13 Reply to Blake's reply: Rank is a "Double Speak" word New Democracy
• 1998/11/12 Re: EM Resource Blake Cretney
• 1998/11/12 quitting for the day Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/12 Re: AV/IRO with equal rankings Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/12 Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/12 Santa Clara & Candidate Withdrawal Option Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/12 [Fwd: MPV/IRO and equal rankings] Bart Ingles
• 1998/11/12 Re: Schulze strictly meets strong 1st Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/12 Re: Rank is a "Double Speak" word Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/12 Re: Instant Run Off in Santa Clara County Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/12 ERS items/ Jenkins Commission DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/12 Re: Undressing the majority winner New Democracy
• 1998/11/12 DRE and Number voting DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/12 FPP with equal rankings Bart Ingles
• 1998/11/12 Re: AV/IRO with equal rankings Bart Ingles
• 1998/11/11 Re: Undressing the majority winner Daniel Davis
• 1998/11/11 Re: EM Resource David Catchpole
• 1998/11/11 Single member district NOT the norm Daniel Davis
• 1998/11/11 AV/IRO with equal rankings Bart Ingles
• 1998/11/11 RE: Undressing the majority winner DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/11 Jenkins Commission Annexes F, G and H DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/11 RE: Two of Mike-O's letters DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/11 Re: Undressing the majority winner Charles Fiterman
• 1998/11/11 Undressing the majority winner Daniel Davis
• 1998/11/11 EM Resource Blake Cretney
• 1998/11/11 Two of Mike-O's letters New Democracy
• 1998/11/11 Re: Revealing the Majority Winner David Marsay
• 1998/11/11 Re: FU@# PLURALITY David Marsay
• 1998/11/11 Re: Margins truncation example David Marsay
• 1998/11/11 Re: Revealing the Majority Winner David Marsay
• 1998/11/11 Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Bart Ingles
• 1998/11/11 Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Bart Ingles
• 1998/11/10 Re: other devious electorate solutions DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/10 World's First National E-Voting Trial etc. (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/10 Re: other devious electorate solutions Blake Cretney
• 1998/11/10 Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Bart Ingles
• 1998/11/10 Re: Schulze strictly meets strong 1st Choice Criterion Blake Cretney
• 1998/11/10 Re: Reveaing the Majority Winner Blake Cretney
• 1998/11/10 Re: FU@# PLURALITY Blake Cretney
• 1998/11/10 Re: Rank is a "Double Speak" word Blake Cretney
• 1998/11/10 Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Steve Eppley
• 1998/11/10 Re: other devious electorate solutions Steve Eppley
• 1998/11/10 Re: Rank is a "Double Speak" word Charles Fiterman
• 1998/11/10 Rank is a "Double Speak" word New Democracy
• 1998/11/10 Re: part 3, 1st Choice Criterion David Marsay
• 1998/11/09 Re: Instant Run Off in Santa Clara County David Catchpole
• 1998/11/09 3 Matrices DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/09 Re: Instant Run Off in Santa Clara County Curtiss Brown
• 1998/11/09 Re: [EM] Initiatives Curtiss Brown
• 1998/11/09 3 Nov 1998 Election Reform Successes DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/09 Re: Election Needed for Gingrich's Seat (news) (FWD) Michael A. Schoenfield
• 1998/11/09 Re: El Questiono Charles Fiterman
• 1998/11/09 Re: El Questiono Wynott
• 1998/11/09 Re: [EM] Initiatives Daniel Davis
• 1998/11/09 What should it take to void an election? Charles Fiterman
• 1998/11/09 Re: [EM] Initiatives William J. Williamson
• 1998/11/09 Schulze strictly meets strong 1st Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/09 El Questiono Daniel Davis
• 1998/11/08 Re: NO DIGRESSION FOR YOU Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/08 Re: Accountability of Lawmakers Daniel Davis
• 1998/11/08 Re: NECESSATARIAN etc. (Off topic) Daniel Davis
• 1998/11/08 Re: First Choice Criterion Michael A. Schoenfield
• 1998/11/08 Re: NECESSATARIAN etc. (Off topic) Bart Ingles
• 1998/11/08 Re: NECESSATARIAN BULLSHIT [Re: First Choice Criterion] Michael A. Schoenfield
• 1998/11/08 electronic proxy voting (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/08 RE: Accountability of Lawmakers DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/08 Election Needed for Gingrich's Seat (news) (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/08 RE: FU@# PLURALITY DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/08 RE: Real Slavery. DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/08 FU@# PLURALITY Daniel Davis
• 1998/11/08 Re:NO DIGRESSION FOR YOU Daniel Davis
• 1998/11/08 Real Slavery. Charles Fiterman
• 1998/11/07 Re: NECESSATARIAN BULLSHIT [Re: First Choice Criterion] Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/07 Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/07 NECESSATARIAN BULLSHIT [Re: First Choice Criterion] Daniel Davis
• 1998/11/07 Re: First Choice Criterion linandmary
• 1998/11/07 Re: [ER] Minnesota and IRO (fwd) lemaun koonce
• 1998/11/07 Re: First Choice Criterion Michael A. Schoenfield
• 1998/11/07 Re: [EM] Initiatives Michael A. Schoenfield
• 1998/11/07 Re: Oregon Passes Vote by Mail (news) (FWD) Michael A. Schoenfield
• 1998/11/06 Slovaks Plan Direct Vote for Leader (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 1998/11/06 Re: [ER] Minnesota and IRO (fwd) Mike Ositoff
• 1998/11/06 Re: [EM] Initiatives Wynott
• 1998/11/06 Re: [EM] Initiatives Daniel Davis
• 1998/11/06 Re: [EM] Initiatives Charles Fiterman

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]