election-methods-list  

Messages by Thread

• [EM] Donald E Davison
  • [EM] Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] RJ Vein
  • Re: [EM] MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] LAYTON Craig
  • RE: [EM] LAYTON Craig
  • [EM] Hugo Harth
  • Re: [EM] Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Blake Cretney
  • RE: [EM] LAYTON Craig
  • Re: [EM] MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] LAYTON Craig
  • RE: [EM] MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Markus Schulze
  • [EM] bbadonov
  • [EM] Alex Small
  • RE: [EM] Narins, Josh
  • [EM] Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Adam Tarr
  • [EM] Joe Weinstein
  • RE: [EM] Narins, Josh
  • RE: [EM] Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Alex Small
• [EM] Recall of a STV member and Direct Democracy Donald E Davison
• [EM] Israeli party-list primary elections Tom Round
  • Re: [EM] Israeli party-list primary elections Tom Round
  • Re: [EM] Israeli party-list primary elections Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Israeli party-list primary elections Markus Schulze
• [EM] CVD 3 single seat methods DEMOREP1
• [EM] Aargh, yet another Rob Lanphier
• Yet another test message Rob Lanphier
• Legislating who gets elected in France Ken & Karla
• 3 FEC Electronic Voting items DEMOREP1
• CV&D Update Donald E Davison
• Re: Peters, H. and P. Wakker (1987) Independence of Irrelevant Alternativesand Revealed Group Preferences (mimeo, Limburg Rijksuniversite it) Ken & Karla
• Peters, H. and P. Wakker (1987) Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives and Revealed Group Preferences (mimeo, Limburg Rijksuniversiteit) David Catchpole
• Another test Rob Lanphier
• Test message(s) Rob Lanphier
• Unidentified subject! Blake Cretney
• Circular Stand-Off Donald E Davison
  • Re: Circular Stand-Off Steve Eppley
  • Re: Circular Stand-Off Markus Schulze
  • Re: Circular Stand-Off Markus Schulze
  • Re: Circular Stand-Off Markus Schulze
  • Re: Circular Stand-Off Markus Schulze
  • Re: Circular Stand-Off Paul Dumais
  • [EM] More on JITW (was Re: Circular Stand-Off) Steve Eppley
  • Re: Circular Stand-Off Markus Schulze
  • Re: Circular Stand-Off Steve Eppley
  • Re: Circular Stand-Off DEMOREP1
• The circularity problem (FWD) Markus Schulze
• Re: The "problem" with circularity (was Re: Reply to Blake Cretney) Markus Schulze
  • Re: The "problem" with circularity (was Re: Reply to Blake Cretney) Steve Eppley
  • Re: The "problem" with circularity (was Re: Reply to Blake Cretney) David Catchpole
  • Re: The "problem" with circularity (was Re: Reply to Blake Cretney) Markus Schulze
  • Re: The "problem" with circularity (was Re: Reply to Blake Cretney) Hugh R. Tobin
  • [EM] Apology for obsolete message re: The "problem" with circularity Hugh R. Tobin
• Decision Table by Jim Lindsay Donald E Davison
• Condorcet Reversed DEMOREP1
• Truncating Condorcet's Ballots Donald E Davison
  • Re: Truncating Condorcet's Ballots?? Steve Eppley
  • Re: Truncating Condorcet's Ballots Blake Cretney
• Voter's Preferred Choice vs Lower Choices Donald E Davison
• Condorcet is Cute Donald E Davison
  • Re: Condorcet is Cute Rob Lanphier
  • Re: Condorcet is Cute Steve Eppley
  • Re: Condorcet is Cute Markus Schulze
  • Re: Condorcet is Cute Blake Cretney
• Circular Ties Blake Cretney
• Reply to Blake Cretney Donald E Davison
  • The "problem" with circularity (was Re: Reply to Blake Cretney) Steve Eppley
  • Re: The "problem" with circularity (was Re: Reply to Blake Cretney) Bart Ingles
• No-Elimination example (FWD) Donald E Davison
• Condorcet without Circular Ties?? - well, maybe!! Donald E Davison
  • Re: Condorcet without Circular Ties?? - well, maybe!! Blake Cretney
• Re: More info on "Just-in-Time Withdrawal" (JITW) Donald E Davison
  • Re: More info on "Just-in-Time Withdrawal" (JITW) Bart Ingles
• Civil Rights Director Opposes NYC's anti-STV agenda Daniel Davis
  • RE: Civil Rights Director Opposes NYC's anti-STV agenda Lytton, Dennis
  • Re: Civil Rights Director Opposes NYC's anti-STV agenda Bart Ingles
• Code of Honor for Reform Activists Donald E Davison
• Cumulative and Limited Voting ??? New Democracy
• brief comments on 1CC definition Mike Ositoff
• a few brief comments about 1CC Mike Ositoff
• [ER] Re: Revealing the Majority Winner New Democracy
  • Re: [ER] Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Mike Ositoff
• A few criterion addenda Mike Ositoff
• solid 1CC definition Mike Ositoff
• small typos Mike Ositoff
• Simpler 1CC substitutes Mike Ositoff
• 1CC definitions were faulty. Mike Ositoff
• Another Election Plan- Proxy P.R. DEMOREP1
• U.S. H. Reps. Gerrymander Results 14 Nov 1998 DEMOREP1
• [EM] Suggested Election Plan for any State New Democracy
• Re: Revealing the Majority Winner DEMOREP1
  • Re: Revealing the Majority Winner DEMOREP1
  • Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Michael A. Schoenfield
  • Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Mike Ositoff
• Schulze Method Markus Schulze
• U.K. Government Defeated Again, etc. (FWD) DEMOREP1
• British Lords revolt against electoral reform (FWD) DEMOREP1
• [EM] Reply from Dan of Illinois New Democracy
  • CUMULATIVE BULLSHIT Daniel Davis
  • Re: [EM] Reply from Dan of Illinois Michael A. Schoenfield
• Reply to Blake's reply: Rank is a "Double Speak" word New Democracy
• quitting for the day Mike Ositoff
• Santa Clara & Candidate Withdrawal Option Mike Ositoff
• [Fwd: MPV/IRO and equal rankings] Bart Ingles
  • Re: [Fwd: MPV/IRO and equal rankings] Mike Ositoff
• ERS items/ Jenkins Commission DEMOREP1
• DRE and Number voting DEMOREP1
• AV/IRO with equal rankings Bart Ingles
  • Re: AV/IRO with equal rankings Bart Ingles
  • FPP with equal rankings Bart Ingles
  • Re: AV/IRO with equal rankings Mike Ositoff
• RE: Undressing the majority winner DEMOREP1
  • Re: Undressing the majority winner New Democracy
• Jenkins Commission Annexes F, G and H DEMOREP1
  • Single member district NOT the norm Daniel Davis
• EM Resource Blake Cretney
  • Re: EM Resource David Catchpole
  • Re: EM Resource Blake Cretney
• Two of Mike-O's letters New Democracy
  • RE: Two of Mike-O's letters DEMOREP1
• World's First National E-Voting Trial etc. (FWD) DEMOREP1
• Re: Reveaing the Majority Winner Blake Cretney
  • Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Bart Ingles
  • Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Bart Ingles
  • Re: Revealing the Majority Winner David Marsay
  • Undressing the majority winner Daniel Davis
  • Re: Undressing the majority winner Charles Fiterman
  • Re: Undressing the majority winner Daniel Davis
  • Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Wayne M. VanWeerthuizen
• Rank is a "Double Speak" word New Democracy
  • Re: Rank is a "Double Speak" word Charles Fiterman
  • Re: Rank is a "Double Speak" word Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Rank is a "Double Speak" word Blake Cretney
• 3 Matrices DEMOREP1
• 3 Nov 1998 Election Reform Successes DEMOREP1
• Re: El Questiono Wynott
• What should it take to void an election? Charles Fiterman
• Schulze strictly meets strong 1st Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Schulze strictly meets strong 1st Choice Criterion Blake Cretney
  • Re: Schulze strictly meets strong 1st Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
• Re: NECESSATARIAN BULLSHIT [Re: First Choice Criterion] Michael A. Schoenfield
  • Re: NECESSATARIAN etc. (Off topic) Bart Ingles
  • Re: NECESSATARIAN etc. (Off topic) Daniel Davis
• electronic proxy voting (FWD) DEMOREP1
• RE: Accountability of Lawmakers DEMOREP1
  • Re: Accountability of Lawmakers Daniel Davis
• Election Needed for Gingrich's Seat (news) (FWD) DEMOREP1
  • Re: Election Needed for Gingrich's Seat (news) (FWD) Michael A. Schoenfield
• RE: FU@# PLURALITY DEMOREP1
  • Re: FU@# PLURALITY Blake Cretney
• RE: Real Slavery. DEMOREP1
• Slovaks Plan Direct Vote for Leader (FWD) DEMOREP1
• Re: [ER] Minnesota and IRO (fwd) Mike Ositoff
  • Re: [ER] Minnesota and IRO (fwd) lemaun koonce
• Re: [EM] Initiatives New Democracy
  • Re: [EM] Initiatives Charles Fiterman
  • Re: [EM] Initiatives Daniel Davis
  • Re: [EM] Initiatives Charles Fiterman
  • Re: [EM] Initiatives Daniel Davis
  • Re: [EM] Initiatives Wynott
  • Re: [EM] Initiatives Michael A. Schoenfield
• Minnesota and IRO Ken & Karla
  • El Questiono Daniel Davis
  • Re: El Questiono Charles Fiterman
• when is defensive strategy needed? Mike Ositoff
• unattainable but useful criterion Mike Ositoff
• Margins order-reversal example Mike Ositoff
• No need to rush into UK voting referendum-Straw (FWD) DEMOREP1
  • Re: No need to rush into UK voting referendum-Straw (FWD) David Catchpole
  • The debut of [email protected]: the Electronic Journal of Electoral Theory, Practice and Reform David Catchpole
  • Re: The debut of [email protected]: the Electronic Journal of Electoral Theory, Practice and Reform David Catchpole
• RE: part 7, 1st Choice Criterion DEMOREP1
• RE: 1st Choice Criterion, part 2 DEMOREP1
  • Re: 1st Choice Criterion, part 2 Mike Ositoff
• Oregon Passes Vote by Mail (news) (FWD) DEMOREP1
  • Re: Oregon Passes Vote by Mail (news) (FWD) Michael A. Schoenfield
• Margins truncation example Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Margins truncation example David Marsay
• RE: Majority based on Eligible Voters??? DEMOREP1
• [EM] Accountability of Lawmakers New Democracy
  • Re: [EM] Initiatives Daniel Davis
  • Re: [EM] Initiatives William J. Williamson
  • Re: [EM] Initiatives Daniel Davis
  • Re: [EM] Initiatives Curtiss Brown
  • Re: Instant Run Off in Santa Clara County Curtiss Brown
  • Re: Instant Run Off in Santa Clara County David Catchpole
  • Re: Instant Run Off in Santa Clara County Mike Ositoff
• part 7, 1st Choice Criterin Mike Ositoff
• part 6, 1st Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
• part 5, 1st Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
• part 3, 1st Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]