At 12:58 PM 10/7/98 -0700, you wrote:
>You're asking a bit too much of a voting system. Shall we
>define a system in which majority rules unless it wants
>to do something bad? Sorry, but democracy doesn't ensure
>that the people will do the right thing, or won't do horrible
>things. So that means that you'd take away democracy?
Constitutional Democracy requires super majorities
to do some kinds of things. This has turned out to
be a very good idea. I doubt we would be having this
conversation legally if that were not so.
The Constitution isn't perfect but its better than
what we've got.
Charles Fiterman Geodesic Systems
414 North Orleans Suite 410 Phone 312 832 1221 x223
Chicago IL 60610-4418 FAX 312 832 1230
http://www.geodesic.com
http://www.il.lp.org/html/1998candidates.html
"Augusts began a campaign to promote traditional family
values with fines for adultery. But he was famous for his
adulteries often seducing the wife and daughters of the same
man. Towards the end he became obsessed with deflowering
virgins and they were brought to the palace as young as
seven." Suetonius
- "more than half the voters???" New Democracy
- Re: "more than half the voters???" Charles Fiterman
- Re: "more than half the voters???" Mike Ositoff
- Re: "more than half the voters???" Charles Fiterman
- Re: "more than half the voters???&q... Mike Ositoff
- Re: "more than half the voters???" Mike Ositoff
- RE: "more than half the voters???" DEMOREP1
- Re: "more than half the voters???" DEMOREP1
