election-methods-list  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? Daniel Davis
  • Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? David Marsay
  • Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? Bart Ingles
  • Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? David Marsay
  • Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? Bart Ingles
  • Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? DEMOREP1
  • Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? David Catchpole
  • Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? DEMOREP1
• Internet Pioneer Postel Dies DEMOREP1
• Berating Mike Ossipoff New Democracy
• Reveling the Majority Winner New Democracy
  • Re: Reveling the Majority Winner New Democracy
  • Re: Reveling the Majority Winner Blake Cretney
  • Re: Reveling the Majority Winner Bart Ingles
  • Re: Reveling the Majority Winner Markus Schulze
  • Re: Reveling the Majority Winner David Catchpole
  • Re: Reveling the Majority Winner DEMOREP1
  • Re: Reveling the Majority Winner Blake Cretney
  • Re: Reveaing the Majority Winner Bart Ingles
  • Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Steve Eppley
  • Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Bart Ingles
  • Re: Revealing the Majority Winner David Marsay
  • Re: Revealing the Majority Winner Bart Ingles
  • Re: Reveling the Majority Winner DEMOREP1
• part 3, applying the criteria Mike Ositoff
• part 2, applying criteria Mike Ositoff
• Applying those criteria Mike Ositoff
  • RE: Applying those criteria DEMOREP1
  • Re: Applying those criteria Blake Cretney
  • Re: Applying those criteria Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Applying those criteria DEMOREP1
• preliminary criteria reply Mike Ositoff
• [Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown] Bart Ingles
• Eliminating the Wrong candidate New Democracy
  • Re: Eliminating the Wrong candidate Blake Cretney
• Votes Against Tiebreaker Bart Ingles
  • Re: Votes Against Tiebreaker Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Votes Against Tiebreaker Bart Ingles
  • Re: Votes Against Tiebreaker Mike Ositoff
  • RE: Votes Against Tiebreaker DEMOREP1
  • RE: Votes Against Tiebreaker Mike Ositoff
  • RE: Votes Against Tiebreaker DEMOREP1
  • Re: Votes Against Tiebreaker Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Votes Against Tiebreaker New Democracy
  • Re: Votes Against Tiebreaker Blake Cretney
• part 4, cat dragged in reply Mike Ositoff
• part 3, cat dragged in reply Mike Ositoff
  • Re: part 3, cat dragged in reply Bart Ingles
  • Re: part 3, cat dragged in reply Mike Ositoff
• part 2, cat dragged in reply Mike Ositoff
• Re: [ER] Look what the cat dragged in! Mike Ositoff
  • Re: [ER] Look what the cat dragged in! Mike Ositoff
• MPV/IRO and equal rankings Blake Cretney
  • Re: MPV/IRO and equal rankings Mike Ositoff
• Will someone else take over the meta election. Charles Fiterman
  • Re: Will someone else take over the meta election. Mike Ositoff
• Look what the cat dragged in! New Democracy
  • Re: Look what the cat dragged in! David Marsay
  • Re: Look what the cat dragged in! Blake Cretney
  • RE: Look what the cat dragged in! DEMOREP1
  • Re: Look what the cat dragged in! Bart Ingles
  • Re: Look what the cat dragged in! Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Look what the cat dragged in! DEMOREP1
  • Re: Look what the cat dragged in! Bart Ingles
  • Re: Look what the cat dragged in! Daniel Davis
  • Re: Look what the cat dragged in! David Catchpole
  • Re: Look what the cat dragged in! Daniel Davis
• Condorcet Basics DEMOREP1
  • Re: Condorcet Basics New Democracy
  • Re: Condorcet Basics DEMOREP1
• Random-fill, majority, cancellation Mike Ositoff
• Re: [ER] IRO fails plurality CWs too. Mike Ositoff
  • Re: [ER] IRO fails plurality CWs too. Marsha Pripstein Posusney
• <[email protected]> Maybe a virus? New Democracy
• The Anti-Democratic Gerrymander DEMOREP1
  • Re: The Anti-Democratic Gerrymander David Marsay
• Ranking can violate secrecy. Charles Fiterman
  • Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. Bart Ingles
  • Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. David Marsay
  • Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. DEMOREP1
  • Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. Charles Fiterman
• correction Mike Ositoff
• The Dummett quote on IRO Mike Ositoff
• Runoff vs IRO Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Runoff vs IRO David Marsay
  • Runoff vs IRO DEMOREP1
  • Re: Runoff vs IRO Charles Fiterman
  • Re: Runoff vs IRO Bart Ingles
• Schulze, SEC, & many candidates Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Schulze, SEC, & many candidates Blake Cretney
  • Re: Schulze, SEC, & many candidates Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Schulze, SEC, & many candidates DEMOREP1
  • Re: Schulze, SEC, & many candidates Mike Ositoff
• Goals & preliminary results Mike Ositoff
• Returned mail: User unknown (fwd) Mike Ositoff
• Sincerity, strategy Mike Ositoff
• Proportional Representation Methods DEMOREP1
• IRO fails plurality CWs too. Mike Ositoff
  • Re: IRO fails plurality CWs too. Bart Ingles
• Returned mail: Cannot send message within 5 days New Democracy
  • Re: Returned mail: Cannot send message within 5 days Bart Ingles
• Italy Begins To Form New Government 10/10/98 DEMOREP1
• U.K. Conservatives Oppose Any Change to Voting System (FWD) DEMOREP1
• Reply to "How to deal with gerrymandering" by CF New Democracy
• Meta election final list. Charles Fiterman
  • Re: Meta election final list. Bart Ingles
  • Re: Meta election final list. Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Meta election final list. Bart Ingles
  • Re: Meta election final list. Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Meta election final list. Charles Fiterman
  • Re: Meta election final list. Charles Fiterman
  • Re: Meta election final list. David Marsay
  • Re: Meta election final list. David Marsay
• How to deal with gerrymandering and term limits. Charles Fiterman
• First-Choice Winner Standard New Democracy
  • Re: First-Choice Winner Standard Bart Ingles
  • RE: First-Choice Winner Standard DEMOREP1
  • RE: First-Choice Winner Standard Charles Fiterman
  • Re: First-Choice Winner Standard Bart Ingles
• Riera/Borrell paper (FWD) DEMOREP1
• Fair Voting BC News Release (FWD) DEMOREP1
• Ways to count meta-election Mike Ositoff
• morea Mike Ositoff
• "more than half the voters???" New Democracy
  • Re: "more than half the voters???" Charles Fiterman
  • Re: "more than half the voters???" Mike Ositoff
  • Re: "more than half the voters???" Charles Fiterman
  • Re: "more than half the voters???" Mike Ositoff
  • Re: "more than half the voters???" Mike Ositoff
  • RE: "more than half the voters???" DEMOREP1
  • Re: "more than half the voters???" DEMOREP1
• Re: The Meta Election is taking nominations. David Catchpole
• Splitting the votes New Democracy
  • Re: Splitting the votes David Catchpole
  • Re: Splitting the votes David Catchpole
• RE: The most destructive form of dishonest voting DEMOREP1
• The most destructive form of dishonest voting. Charles Fiterman
  • Re: The most destructive form of dishonest voting. New Democracy
• Nominating Standards and Goals New Democracy
  • Re: Nominating Standards and Goals Charles Fiterman
  • Nominating standards and goals Charles Fiterman
• Re: Approval/Plurality Bart Ingles
• Approval/Plurality combinations Bart Ingles
  • Approval/Plurality: clarification Bart Ingles
  • Re: Approval/Plurality combinations Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Approval/Plurality combinations Bart Ingles
  • RE: Approval/Plurality combinations DEMOREP1
  • Re: Approval/Plurality combinations Bart Ingles
  • Re: Approval/Plurality combinations Bart Ingles
  • Making approval guarantee a majority. Charles Fiterman
  • Re: Approval/Plurality combinations DEMOREP1
• Simple circular tie DEMOREP1
  • Simple Circular Tie DEMOREP1
  • RE: Simple Circular Tie DEMOREP1
• Oregon mail ballots DEMOREP1
• Some more standards Bart Ingles
  • Re: Some more standards Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Some more standards Bart Ingles
  • Re: Some more standards Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Some more standards New Democracy
  • Re: Some more standards Bart Ingles
• DW: US DNet Goes National (FWD) DEMOREP1
• A suggestion to smarten tactical voting. Charles Fiterman
• Donald Davison's Standards New Democracy
  • Re: Donald Davison's Standards Mike Ositoff
• Brazil electronic voting (FWD) DEMOREP1
• Re: What about a meta election? (fwd) David Catchpole
  • Re: What about a meta election? (fwd) Bart Ingles
• votes for & against Mike Ositoff
• 1/2 option Mike Ositoff
• Alternative Schwartz Definition Mike Ositoff
• my designated count rule Mike Ositoff
  • Re: my designated count rule David Catchpole
• My Vote Mike Ositoff
  • RE: My Vote DEMOREP1
• Voter's Choice Mike Ositoff
• part 3, meta election Mike Ositoff
  • Re: part 3, meta election David Catchpole
  • The Meta Election is taking nominations. Charles Fiterman
  • Re: The Meta Election is taking nominations. David Catchpole
• part 2, meta election Mike Ositoff
• Meta Election Mike Ositoff
  • Meta election Charles Fiterman
• LO2E-2 Criterion Mike Ositoff
  • Re: LO2E-2 Criterion Blake Cretney
• Strangeness revisited Mike Ositoff
• Oregon's Ballot Under Criticism (FWD) DEMOREP1
  • Re: Oregon's Ballot Under Criticism (FWD) Bart Ingles
• CAMPEL-L: Prez 2000 - New Primary, etc. DEMOREP1
  • Re: CAMPEL-L: Prez 2000 - New Primary, etc. Gary Swing
• Vote reform hits snags within UK's Labour (FWD) DEMOREP1
• Does VA Schulze violate SEC? Blake Cretney
  • Does VA Schulze violate SEC? Blake Cretney
  • Re: Does VA Schulze violate SEC? Markus Schulze
  • Re: Does VA Schulze violate SEC? Blake Cretney
  • Re: Does VA Schulze violate SEC? Markus Schulze

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]