election-methods-list  

Messages by Date

• 1998/10/22 Re: What do you do when the system breaks down absolutly. Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/22 preferences counted standard Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/22 Re: [ER] What Use? Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/22 Monotonicity isn't demanding Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/22 RE: What Use? DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/22 What do you do when the system breaks down absolutly. Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/22 Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/22 [em] What Use? New Democracy
• 1998/10/22 Re: More standards David Marsay
• 1998/10/22 Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? David Marsay
• 1998/10/21 Re: Look what the cat dragged in! Daniel Davis
• 1998/10/21 Re: Look what the cat dragged in! David Catchpole
• 1998/10/20 Re: More Standards Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/20 Re: Applying those criteria Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/20 Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/20 Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/20 Re: Applying those criteria DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/20 RE: More standards DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/20 More standards Blake Cretney
• 1998/10/20 Re: Applying those criteria Blake Cretney
• 1998/10/20 Re: Votes Against Tiebreaker Blake Cretney
• 1998/10/20 Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/20 Voter Petitions DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/20 Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? David Marsay
• 1998/10/20 MikeO should talk to Santa Clara New Democracy
• 1998/10/20 Re: Votes Against Tiebreaker New Democracy
• 1998/10/20 Re: Runoff vs IRO Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/19 Re: Look what the cat dragged in! Daniel Davis
• 1998/10/19 Re: Look what the cat dragged in! Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/19 Re: Reveling the Majority Winner David Catchpole
• 1998/10/19 Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? David Catchpole
• 1998/10/19 Re: Votes Against Tiebreaker Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/19 Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/19 Re: Look what the cat dragged in! DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/19 RE: Votes Against Tiebreaker DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/19 RE: DEMOREP's Condorcet Tiebreaker DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/19 Re: Reveling the Majority Winner DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/19 Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/19 Re: Reveling the Majority Winner Markus Schulze
• 1998/10/19 Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/19 Re: Eliminating the Wrong candidate Blake Cretney
• 1998/10/19 Re: Reveling the Majority Winner Blake Cretney
• 1998/10/19 Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? Daniel Davis
• 1998/10/19 Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/19 Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/19 Re: part 3, cat dragged in reply Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/19 Re: Look what the cat dragged in! Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/19 Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? Daniel Davis
• 1998/10/19 Re: Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? Fillard Rhyne
• 1998/10/19 Re: Reveling the Majority Winner New Democracy
• 1998/10/19 Re: part 3, cat dragged in reply Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/19 DEMOREP's Condorcet Tiebreaker New Democracy
• 1998/10/18 Re: Look what the cat dragged in! Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/18 Shouldn't Talk To Santa Clara? Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/18 RE: Votes Against Tiebreaker Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/18 RE: Applying those criteria DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/18 Re: Schulze, SEC, & many candidates Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/18 RE: Votes Against Tiebreaker DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/18 Re: Schulze, SEC, & many candidates DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/18 Internet Pioneer Postel Dies DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/18 Berating Mike Ossipoff New Democracy
• 1998/10/18 Reveling the Majority Winner New Democracy
• 1998/10/18 part 3, applying the criteria Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/18 part 2, applying criteria Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/18 Applying those criteria Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/17 preliminary criteria reply Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/17 Re: Votes Against Tiebreaker Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/17 [Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown] Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/17 Re: Votes Against Tiebreaker Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/17 Eliminating the Wrong candidate New Democracy
• 1998/10/17 Re: Votes Against Tiebreaker Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/16 Re: MPV/IRO and equal rankings Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/16 Votes Against Tiebreaker Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/16 Re: Schulze, SEC, & many candidates Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/16 Re: Will someone else take over the meta election. Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/16 Re: [ER] Look what the cat dragged in! Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/16 part 4, cat dragged in reply Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/16 part 3, cat dragged in reply Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/16 part 2, cat dragged in reply Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/16 Re: [ER] Look what the cat dragged in! Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/16 Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/16 Re: Condorcet Basics DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/16 RE: Look what the cat dragged in! DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/16 Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/16 MPV/IRO and equal rankings Blake Cretney
• 1998/10/16 Re: Look what the cat dragged in! Blake Cretney
• 1998/10/16 Re: Schulze, SEC, & many candidates Blake Cretney
• 1998/10/16 Re: Santa Clara's choice David Marsay
• 1998/10/16 Re: Look what the cat dragged in! David Marsay
• 1998/10/16 Re: Condorcet Basics New Democracy
• 1998/10/16 Will someone else take over the meta election. Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/16 Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. David Marsay
• 1998/10/16 Re: The Anti-Democratic Gerrymander David Marsay
• 1998/10/16 Look what the cat dragged in! New Democracy
• 1998/10/16 Re: Runoff vs IRO David Marsay
• 1998/10/16 Re: Meta election final list. David Marsay
• 1998/10/16 Re: Meta election final list. David Marsay
• 1998/10/16 Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/15 Condorcet Basics DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/15 Re: [ER] IRO fails plurality CWs too. Marsha Pripstein Posusney
• 1998/10/14 Random-fill, majority, cancellation Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/14 Re: [ER] IRO fails plurality CWs too. Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/14 Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/14 <[email protected]> Maybe a virus? New Democracy
• 1998/10/13 Re: IRO fails plurality CWs too. Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/13 The Anti-Democratic Gerrymander DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/13 Re: Runoff vs IRO Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/13 Runoff vs IRO DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/13 Ranking can violate secrecy. Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/12 correction Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/12 The Dummett quote on IRO Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/12 Runoff vs IRO Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/12 Schulze, SEC, & many candidates Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/12 Goals & preliminary results Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/12 Returned mail: User unknown (fwd) Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/12 Sincerity, strategy Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/12 Re: Meta election final list. Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/12 Re: Meta election final list. Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/11 Re: Returned mail: Cannot send message within 5 days Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/11 Proportional Representation Methods DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/11 IRO fails plurality CWs too. Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/11 Returned mail: Cannot send message within 5 days New Democracy
• 1998/10/10 Re: Meta election final list. Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/10 Italy Begins To Form New Government 10/10/98 DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/09 U.K. Conservatives Oppose Any Change to Voting System (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/09 Re: Meta election final list. Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/09 Reply to "How to deal with gerrymandering" by CF New Democracy
• 1998/10/09 Re: Meta election final list. Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/09 Re: Some more standards Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/09 Re: "more than half the voters???" Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/09 Re: Meta election final list. Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/09 Meta election final list. Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/09 Re: Comments on David Marsay's Comments - Number 2 David Marsay
• 1998/10/09 Re: More comments on Lord Jenkin's proposals David Marsay
• 1998/10/09 Re: Comments on David Marsay's Comments - Number 1 David Marsay
• 1998/10/09 Re: Approval equilibrium. Pushover strategy. David Marsay
• 1998/10/09 Re: UK - Lord Jenkin's Proposals David Marsay
• 1998/10/09 Re: [EM] Reply to DEMOREP on Lord Jenkin's Proposals David Marsay
• 1998/10/09 RE: Reply to DEMOREP on Lord Jenkin's Proposals David Marsay
• 1998/10/08 Re: First-Choice Winner Standard Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/08 Re: First-Choice Winner Standard Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/08 Re: Some more standards Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/08 Re: Approval/Plurality combinations Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/08 Re: Some more standards Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/08 How to deal with gerrymandering and term limits. Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/08 RE: First-Choice Winner Standard Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/08 RE: First-Choice Winner Standard DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/08 Re: "more than half the voters???" Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/08 First-Choice Winner Standard New Democracy
• 1998/10/07 Riera/Borrell paper (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/07 Re: "more than half the voters???" DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/07 Re: Does VA Schulze violate SEC? DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/07 Re: Approval/Plurality combinations DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/07 RE: "more than half the voters???" DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/07 Fair Voting BC News Release (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/07 Ways to count meta-election Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/07 Re: VA, Margins, & voter wishes Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/07 Re: VA, Margins, & voter wishes Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/07 morea Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/07 Re: "more than half the voters???" Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/07 Re: "more than half the voters???" Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/07 Re: "more than half the voters???" Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/07 Re: The most destructive form of dishonest voting. New Democracy
• 1998/10/07 "more than half the voters???" New Democracy
• 1998/10/07 Making approval guarantee a majority. Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/07 Re: The Meta Election is taking nominations. David Catchpole
• 1998/10/07 Re: Splitting the votes David Catchpole
• 1998/10/07 Re: Splitting the votes David Catchpole
• 1998/10/06 Re: Randomizing in [EM] not infallible, but too attractive Hugh R. Tobin
• 1998/10/06 Splitting the votes New Democracy
• 1998/10/06 Re: Some more standards New Democracy
• 1998/10/06 Re: Approval/Plurality combinations Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/06 Re: VA, Margins, & voter wishes Hugh R. Tobin
• 1998/10/06 Re: Some more standards Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/06 Re: What about a meta election? Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/06 Re: Donald Davison's Standards Mike Ositoff
• 1998/10/06 Re: Approval/Plurality combinations Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/06 Re: Approval/Plurality combinations Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/06 Re: Does VA Schulze violate SEC? Blake Cretney
• 1998/10/06 Re: Does VA Schulze violate SEC? Markus Schulze
• 1998/10/06 Re: VA, Margins, & voter wishes Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/06 Re: Does VA Schulze violate SEC? Blake Cretney
• 1998/10/06 Re: VA, Margins, & voter wishes Blake Cretney
• 1998/10/06 Re: LO2E-2 Criterion Blake Cretney
• 1998/10/06 RE: Approval/Plurality combinations DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/06 RE: The most destructive form of dishonest voting DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/06 The most destructive form of dishonest voting. Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/06 Nominating standards and goals Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/06 Re: Nominating Standards and Goals Charles Fiterman
• 1998/10/06 Nominating Standards and Goals New Democracy
• 1998/10/06 Approval/Plurality: clarification Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/06 Re: Approval/Plurality Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/06 Approval/Plurality combinations Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/05 Simple circular tie DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/05 Re: The Meta Election is taking nominations. David Catchpole
• 1998/10/05 Oregon mail ballots DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/05 Some more standards Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/05 Re: What about a meta election? Bart Ingles
• 1998/10/05 Re: What about a meta election? DEMOREP1
• 1998/10/05 DW: US DNet Goes National (FWD) DEMOREP1

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]