I am new here. What is the consensus on having a nationwide referenda process?
(i.e. Enough signatures in 50 states to place a binding federal statute. Ross
Perot's supporters managed to put his name on all 50 states) [i think]
Bart Ingles wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Mr. Ingles asked-
> >
> > I believe you are on the right track by including some sort of absolute
> > approval requirement, at least if you insist on going with Condorcet, but what
> > if no candidate has a majority YES vote?
> > --
> > D- another part of my standard mantra-
> >
> > I suggest again that if no choice gets a majority of all the votes, then the
> > legislative body (elected by an accurate majority rule p.r. method) can fill
> > the vacancy.
>
> So much for direct democracy.
--
_____ |~~~~~~~~~| |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Y_,___|[] | | Visit | | http://www.opposition.org |
|_|_|_|dd |_,_|_________|_,_|_____________________________________|
//oo---OO=OO OOO OOO OOO OOO OOO OOO
* Daniel Davis - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Junior, University of Florida *
* Encryption Certificate available at http://www.verisign.com *
* VISIT MY WWW SITE AND SIGN MY GUESTBOOK AT *
* ***http://www.opposition.org*** *
* MAGNA EST VERITAS, ET PRAEVALEBIT *
**********************************************************************
