Tom Ruen wrote: > > Finally, I'll ask a bigger question than my original one (Unranked-IRV or > Plurality): > > If we are limited to unranked ballots, for single seat, single ballot > elections, which method would you prefer: Plurality, Unranked-IRV or > Approval voting? (or some other method?) Why would you ever support unranked IRV over approval voting? It might be useful in multi-seat elections, but is there anything that would warrant iterative counting in single-seat districts? Bart
- [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Tom Ruen
- [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - where do winner... Tom Ruen
- [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent w... Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - div... Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval ... Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Appro... Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus A... Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus A... Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus A... Tom Ruen
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
