Tom Ruen wrote: > About the instability of elimination among 3 strong candidates, in ranked or > unranked IRV, I'm still not overly afraid. Small spoilers are the more > common enemy. Well, they are at the moment, cause Plurality kills off small spoilers before they have a chance to grow into large spoilers. Plurality lets third parties become just powerful enough to result in people being elected when a majority would prefer their opponent. Is there any reason to suppose that IRV wouldn't do the same?
- [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Tom Ruen
- [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - where do winner... Tom Ruen
- [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent w... Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - div... Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval ... Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Appro... Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus A... Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus A... Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus A... Tom Ruen
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Tom Ruen
