On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Richard Moore wrote:
<snip>
> Doug,
>
> If I'm not mistaken this is the same as what we've referred
> to on this list as Cardinal Ratings (CR). This is a very
> good system as long as the voters have no reason to vote
> strategically (impartial judges in a contest, for instance).
> As soon as voters begin to vote strategically, they will
> exagerrate their preferences, rating candidates either 0 or
> 10, so that the system becomes equivalent to Approval. Of
> course, that doesn't make it a bad system, since Approval is
> a good system; it just doesn't have any advantage over
> Approval in such applications.
>
> Richard
>
I want to add my "Amen" to Richard's comment, and to welcome Doug to the
EM list.
Welcome! I hope you can filter out our pride and prejudices enough to
enjoy the good ideas that sometimes appear. We look forward to more of
your insights.
Forest
