election-methods-list  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [EM] IFPP for more than three candidates? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] IFPP for more than three candidates? Markus Schulze
• Re: Why 3 and not 4? Forest Simmons
• Re: [FairVoteOR] Why 3 and not 4? (fwd) Forest Simmons
• [EM] Participation axiom re 2nd preference alterations Craig Carey
• Re: Fluffy the Dog and group strategy DEMOREP1
• IFPP and Schulze comments (re [EM] Craig's posts Craig Carey
  • Re: IFPP and Schulze comments (re [EM] Craig's posts Markus Schulze
• Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Craig Layton
  • Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Anthony Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Moe St. EverGreen
  • Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Craig Layton
  • Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Bart Ingles
• [EM] Multiple Attacks on the U.S.A. DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Multiple Attacks on the U.S.A. donald
  • Re: [EM] Multiple Attacks on the U.S.A. Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Multiple Attacks on the U.S.A. Forest Simmons
• [EM] Consistency; IFPP Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Seven +/- Two Buddha Buck
  • Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Roy
  • Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Roy
  • Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
• [EM] Two new election books DEMOREP1
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Roy One
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences heitzig
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Buddha Buck
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Anthony Simmons
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Anthony Simmons
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Anthony Simmons
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Bart Ingles
• [EM] When 0 winners is best Roy
• [EM] Mr Ketchum: Rule on when 0 winners is best for 1 winner elections Craig Carey
• [EM] Fla. Rids Itself of Punch-Card Ballots DEMOREP1
• Re: [EM] FBC (Favorite Betrayal Criterion) Definition Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] FBC (Favorite Betrayal Criterion) Definition Forest Simmons
• [EM] Craig's posts Roy One
  • Re: [EM] Craig's posts Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Craig's posts Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Craig's posts Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Craig's posts Roy
  • Re: [EM] Craig's posts Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] Craig's posts Markus Schulze
• RE: Circular defeats [was Re: IRV is summable (a little)] DEMOREP1
• [EM] Fluffy the dog: rejection of Condorcet Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Fluffy the dog: rejection of Condorcet Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Fluffy the dog: rejection of Condorcet Craig Carey
• [EM] Circular defeats [was Re: IRV is summable (a little)] Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: IRV is summable (a little) DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Re: IRV is summable (a little) Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Re: IRV is summable (a little) Buddha Buck
• Re: [EM] IRV is summable (a little) Buddha Buck
• [EM] Mr Simmons: provide the FBC definition please Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Mr Simmons: provide the FBC definition please Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Mr Simmons: provide the FBC definition please Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
• [EM] Political poll results Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] Political poll results Richard Moore
• RE: CR pairwise DEMOREP1
  • Re: CR pairwise Roy
  • Re: CR pairwise Roy
  • Re: CR pairwise Rob LeGrand
  • Re: CR pairwise Roy One
  • Re: CR pairwise Richard Moore
  • Re: CR pairwise Forest Simmons
  • Re: CR pairwise Roy
  • Re: CR pairwise Forest Simmons
  • Re: CR pairwise Roy
• [EM] CR pairwise Forest Simmons
• [EM] Political party poll Rob LeGrand
• Re: [EM] New poll Forest Simmons
• Re: [EM] Three Tier, Dyadic via CR, etc. Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Three Tier, Dyadic via CR, etc. Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Three Tier, Dyadic via CR, etc. Forest Simmons
• [EM] Dyadic approval implemented as CR Roy
  • Re: [EM] Dyadic approval implemented as CR Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Dyadic approval implemented as CR Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Dyadic approval implemented as CR Moe St. EverGreen
  • Re: [EM] Dyadic approval implemented as CR Forest Simmons
• [EM] Consistency Criterion Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Consistency Criterion Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consistency Criterion Forest Simmons
• RE: three tier approval DEMOREP1
  • RE: three tier approval DEMOREP1
• RE: EXAMPLES OF STV-VOTING PATHOLOGIES DEMOREP1
• [EM] Beatpath for dummies Roy
• [EM] EXAMPLES OF STV-VOTING PATHOLOGIES Douglas Greene
  • RE: [EM] EXAMPLES OF STV-VOTING PATHOLOGIES LAYTON Craig
• RE: three (? four) tier approval DEMOREP1
• Re: [EM] Demorep's new method Anthony Simmons
• [EM] three tier approval LAYTON Craig
  • Re: [EM] three tier approval Richard Moore
  • RE: [EM] three tier approval LAYTON Craig
  • Re: [EM] three tier approval Richard Moore
  • RE: [EM] three tier approval LAYTON Craig
  • Re: [EM] three tier approval Craig Layton
  • RE: [EM] three tier approval Forest Simmons
• [EM] FEC- Federal Elections 2000 (data) DEMOREP1
• [EM] Don't ignore the margins. Roy
  • [EM] Don't ignore the margins. Roy
  • Re: [EM] Don't ignore the margins. Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Don't ignore the margins. Roy
• [EM] Ignore the margins! Roy
• [EM] Democracy Dispatches, Number 6 (FWD) DEMOREP1
• [EM] U.S.A. GOVERNMENT SUMMARY MINORITY RULE MATH, 2001-2003, 14 Aug 2001 DEMOREP1
• [EM] Politicians Wade Into Redistricting DEMOREP1
• Re: Fixing IRV DEMOREP1
• [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Roy
  • Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Roy
  • Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Roy
  • Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Richard Moore
• [EM] Grouping/bifurcation elimination methods Roy
  • Re: [EM] Grouping/bifurcation elimination methods Richard Moore
• Re: [EM] Alternative counting method for RP Roy
• [EM] U.S.A. HOUSE OF REPS., NOV. 2000 ELECTION, GROUPS MATH DEMOREP1
• [EM] A new election method... Buddha Buck
  • Re: [EM] A new election method... Roy
• [EM] Strategic voting in ratings Roy
  • Re: [EM] Strategic voting in ratings Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Strategic voting in ratings Richard Moore
• [EM] Caltech/MIT election report URL DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Caltech/MIT election report URL Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Fixing IRV Roy One
  • Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Roy
  • Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Richard Moore
  • RE: [EM] Fixing IRV LAYTON Craig
  • Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Richard Moore
• [EM] Missing the ballots' information MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] Introduction (cont.) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Introduction (cont.) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Introduction (cont.) Forest Simmons
  • Re: Re: [EM] Introduction (cont.) DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Introduction (cont.) Roy One
  • Re: [EM] Introduction (cont.) Buddha Buck
  • Re: [EM] Introduction (cont.) Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Introduction (cont.) Roy
  • Re: [EM] Introduction (cont.) Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Introduction (cont.) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Introduction (cont.) Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Introduction (cont.) Bart Ingles
• RE: Reply to Randy DEMOREP1
• [EM] Reply to Randy MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Fine-grained option Jeandr�
  • RE: [EM] Fine-grained option LAYTON Craig
• [EM] Introduction Douglas Greene
• Re: Maximum Consent DEMOREP1
• [EM] Runoff Approval MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Reply to Craig (Aug 1, '01) MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] Reply to Craig (Aug 1, '01) LAYTON Craig
• [EM] For Marku: dropping & "not there" MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] For Marku: dropping & "not there" LAYTON Craig
  • Re: [EM] For Marku: dropping & "not there" Markus Schulze
• [EM] RE: [EM] National Commission on Federal Election Reform�-- Final Report LAYTON Craig
• [EM] National Commission on Federal Election Reform�-- Final Report DEMOREP1
• [EM] Maximum Consent Anthony Simmons

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]